Gearman is a system to farm out work to other machines, dispatching function calls to machines that are better suited to do work, to do work in parallel, to load balance lots of function calls, or to call functions between languages. This is the server daemon component. The bridge between workers (clients who can do work) and callers (clients who want work done). You should run several of these, at least two, for both load balancing and high availability. WWW: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gearman-Server/ Port maintainer (vivek@khera.org) is cc'd. This is a new version of devel/p5-gearmand, required by recent sysutils/p5-mogilefs-server (ports/116013). Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.77
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->clsung I'll take it.
clsung 2007-09-08 08:17:15 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: devel Makefile Added files: devel/p5-Gearman-Server Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist devel/p5-Gearman-Server/files gearmand.in Log: Gearman is a system to farm out work to other machines, dispatching function calls to machines that are better suited to do work, to do work in parallel, to load balance lots of function calls, or to call functions between languages. This is the server daemon component. The bridge between workers (clients who can do work) and callers (clients who want work done). You should run several of these, at least two, for both load balancing and high availability. WWW: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gearman-Server/ PR: ports/116050 Submitted by: Tomoyuki Sakurai <cherry at trombik.org> Revision Changes Path 1.2869 +1 -0 ports/devel/Makefile 1.1 +31 -0 ports/devel/p5-Gearman-Server/Makefile (new) 1.1 +3 -0 ports/devel/p5-Gearman-Server/distinfo (new) 1.1 +26 -0 ports/devel/p5-Gearman-Server/files/gearmand.in (new) 1.1 +10 -0 ports/devel/p5-Gearman-Server/pkg-descr (new) 1.1 +10 -0 ports/devel/p5-Gearman-Server/pkg-plist (new) _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
State Changed From-To: open->closed New port added. Thank You.
Hi... Sorry I've been out of the loop for a while. Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems wrong to do that. Furthermore, since this port replaces devel/p5-gearmand, it should have either been repo-copied, or moved, or some such, and appropriate entries in UPDATING created so that the various ports tools can follow the move.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new > port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems > wrong to do that. You can't just drop your kitten on our doorstep and expect us to take care of it. If you want us to help you with your kitten you should take responsibility for it. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
On Sep 24, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: >> Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new >> port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems >> wrong to do that. > > You can't just drop your kitten on our doorstep and expect us to > take care of it. If you want us to help you with your kitten you > should take responsibility for it. Excuse me, but what exactly did *I* do wrong? Did I submit a *new* port and assign maintainership to *you*? I don't think so.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:27:14AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Sep 24, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new > >>port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems > >>wrong to do that. > > > >You can't just drop your kitten on our doorstep and expect us to > >take care of it. If you want us to help you with your kitten you > >should take responsibility for it. > > Excuse me, but what exactly did *I* do wrong? Did I submit a *new* > port and assign maintainership to *you*? I don't think so. Heh, I meant the other guy :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
Sorry Vivek, I didn't notice the maintainer address is not equal to submitter's. I'll update UPDATING first. Hi Tomoyuki, Can you discuss this issue with us? On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:20:11PM +0000, Vivek Khera wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/116050; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman server daemon > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:11:02 -0400 > > Hi... Sorry I've been out of the loop for a while. > > Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new > port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems > wrong to do that. > > Furthermore, since this port replaces devel/p5-gearmand, it should > have either been repo-copied, or moved, or some such, and appropriate > entries in UPDATING created so that the various ports tools can > follow the move. > -- Alan Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
clsung 2007-09-26 01:23:30 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: . UPDATING Log: - state the update of devel/p5-gearmand to devel/p5-Gearman-Server Pointhat to: clsung (myself) PR: ports/116050 Revision Changes Path 1.549 +13 -1 ports/UPDATING _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: > Sorry Vivek, > > I didn't notice the maintainer address is not equal to submitter's. > I'll update UPDATING first. > > Hi Tomoyuki, > > Can you discuss this issue with us? This case is not a big deal since I planned to upgrade the p5- gearmand port to this anyhow. It is just a little bit of a mess right now since there are two ports of the same software with different names. I submitted a PR to "move" the p5-gearmand to p5- Gearman-Server port In two cases before someone submitted a "maintainer-update" ticket on a port I maintain (databases/slony1) and it was upgraded without my knowledge or agreement. It was also upgraded to a known broken version, which also caused people some problems. I really think that as the ports community grows, that more diligence needs to be paid to who is submitting updates, etc. There needs to be some better authentication that the submitter is who they say they are, and that new ports are assigned to the person who submitted them. Most of the time it has worked out. For every other port I maintain, I have gotten proper notice of suggested changes.
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 10:19:29 Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: > Sorry Vivek, > > I didn't notice the maintainer address is not equal to submitter's. > I'll update UPDATING first. > > Hi Tomoyuki, > > Can you discuss this issue with us? Sure. How can I help you? > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:20:11PM +0000, Vivek Khera wrote: > > The following reply was made to PR ports/116050; it has been noted by > > GNATS. > > > > From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> > > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > > Cc: freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> > > Subject: Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman > > server daemon Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:11:02 -0400 > > > > Hi... Sorry I've been out of the loop for a while. > > > > Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new > > port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems > > wrong to do that. > > > > Furthermore, since this port replaces devel/p5-gearmand, it should > > have either been repo-copied, or moved, or some such, and appropriate > > entries in UPDATING created so that the various ports tools can > > follow the move. Hi Vivek, I should have expressed more clearly that the port was renamed version of devel/p5-gearmand. Sorry for that. -- Tomoyuki Sakurai