Update mail/libetpan to version 0.56 This is stability update, it fxes 3 crashers and nothing more, see this link for details: http://libetpan.cvs.sourceforge.net/libetpan/libetpan/ChangeLog?revision=1.367&view=markup Any chances this could be commited before 6.4 an 7.1 release?
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->miwi I'll take it.
I'd propose that we update to 0.57 instead, because claws-mail 3.6.1 requires it. I've attached a patch that does this, and also: -adds the ipv6 CATEGORY; -attempts to fix the build WITHOUT_IPV6; -sorts the pkg-plist; -adds a minor CONFIGURE_ENV tweak. Regards, b.
Just to be on the same page here, committing of this port and all of claws-mail-* ports is planned after ports freeze in which we are now. Everything looks ok, just one remark: +.if defined(WITHOUT_IPV6) || defined(WITHOUT_INET6) || defined(WITHOUT_INET6_SUPPORT) here I think we should stick to knobs defined in /usr/ports/KNOBS, so only check for WITHOUT_IPV6.
--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Pawe=C5=82 P=C4=99kala <c0rn@o2.pl> wrote: > From: Pawe=C5=82 P=C4=99kala <c0rn@o2.pl> > Subject: Re: ports/127327: [maintainer update] mail/libetpan update to ve= rsion 0.56 > To: "bf" <bf2006a@yahoo.com> > Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org > Date: Monday, November 17, 2008, 11:32 AM > Just to be on the same page here, committing of this port > and all of > claws-mail-* ports is planned after ports freeze in which > we are now. >=20 > Everything looks ok, just one remark: >=20 > +.if defined(WITHOUT_IPV6) || defined(WITHOUT_INET6) || > defined(WITHOUT_INET6_SUPPORT) >=20 > here I think we should stick to knobs defined in > /usr/ports/KNOBS, so > only check for WITHOUT_IPV6. If you like -- but I think the added cost of the additional checks is negligible, and I was trying to protect those who may have disabled ipv6 in the base system by using the last two knobs in make.conf, rather than a separate src.conf, which is sometimes the case. See src.conf(5). Regards, b. =0A=0A=0A
>If you like -- but I think the added cost of the additional checks is >negligible, and I was trying to protect those who may have disabled >ipv6 in the base system by using the last two knobs in make.conf, >rather than a separate src.conf, which is sometimes the case. See >src.conf(5). I was not familiar with src.conf before as I`m still on FreeBSD 6. After reading it`s manpage I think it was especially created to end mixing of ports and src options in make.conf, which is a little messy thing to do. So I think we should follow src developers example and try not to mix options of ports and src trees. What is your take on this matter miwi?
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed. Thanks!
miwi 2009-01-12 12:50:32 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: mail/libetpan Makefile distinfo Log: - Update to 0.57 PR: 127327 Submitted by: "Pawel Pekala" <c0rn@o2.pl> (maintainer) Revision Changes Path 1.50 +17 -7 ports/mail/libetpan/Makefile 1.30 +3 -3 ports/mail/libetpan/distinfo _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"