Bug 136286 - [MAINTAINER] x11-toolkits/scintilla: update to 1.79
Summary: [MAINTAINER] x11-toolkits/scintilla: update to 1.79
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Wesley Shields
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-07-03 16:20 UTC by Naram Qashat
Modified: 2009-07-07 00:40 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
scintilla-1.79.patch (8.42 KB, patch)
2009-07-03 16:20 UTC, Naram Qashat 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Naram Qashat 2009-07-03 16:20:06 UTC 
- Update to 1.79

Added file(s):
- files/patch-makefile

Removed file(s):
- files/patch-aa
- files/patch-gcc41

Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.77
Comment 1 Wesley Shields freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-07-03 16:22:55 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->wxs

I'll take it.
Comment 2 dfilter service freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-07-07 00:33:26 UTC 
wxs         2009-07-06 23:33:17 UTC

  FreeBSD ports repository

  Modified files:
    x11-toolkits/scintilla Makefile distinfo 
  Removed files:
    x11-toolkits/scintilla/files patch-gcc41 
  Log:
  - Update to 1.79
  
  PR:             ports/136286
  Submitted by:   Naram Qashat <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com>
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.47      +1 -1      ports/x11-toolkits/scintilla/Makefile
  1.31      +3 -3      ports/x11-toolkits/scintilla/distinfo
  1.2       +0 -20     ports/x11-toolkits/scintilla/files/patch-gcc41 (dead)
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Comment 3 Wesley Shields freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-07-07 00:34:13 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Commit, with minor changes. There was no need to rename patch-aa to 
patch-makefile, especially since that would have lost the history of 
patch-aa. This kind of thing is better off done as a repocopy but is not 
important enough for a single file. The name, while not very descriptive 
is not harmful.