Bug 137554 - port upgrade: ftp/linux-f10-curl
Summary: port upgrade: ftp/linux-f10-curl
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-emulation (Nobody)
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-08 03:40 UTC by Rick E.
Modified: 2009-08-08 14:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
file.shar (2.81 KB, text/plain)
2009-08-08 03:40 UTC, Rick E.
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rick E. freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-08-08 03:40:00 UTC
Updated this port to 7.19.4-6. Didn't run it by the emulation mailing list, but if it's of any use, here it is.

Fix: Patch attached with submission follows:
Comment 1 Edwin Groothuis freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-08-08 03:40:12 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation

Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
Comment 2 dfilter service freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-08-08 13:48:17 UTC
bsam        2009-08-08 12:48:01 UTC

  FreeBSD ports repository

  Modified files:
    ftp/linux-f10-curl   Makefile distinfo.i386 
  Log:
  Update to version 7.19.4-6.fc10.
  
  PR:             ports/137554 (based on)
  Submitted by:   codebloc
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.10      +2 -2      ports/ftp/linux-f10-curl/Makefile
  1.7       +9 -9      ports/ftp/linux-f10-curl/distinfo.i386
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Comment 3 Boris Samorodov freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-08-08 13:48:22 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed with some changes. 

Your distfile was not correct. To create a correct one you should 
fetch a linux port and makesum with an option PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES. 
One more hint: a shar archieve is good for new ports (BTW, the base 
should not be a / file system -- the committers ports will be overwritten). 
For good patch one may checkout a port from cvs, apply changes and 
send a unified diff. 

Anyway thanks for the report and the patch, much appreciated!