Bug 156441 - [NEW PORT] devel/portbuilder-devel-0.1.2: Concurrent FreeBSD port builder
Summary: [NEW PORT] devel/portbuilder-devel-0.1.2: Concurrent FreeBSD port builder
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Max Brazhnikov
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-04-16 12:50 UTC by David Naylor
Modified: 2011-04-30 11:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
file.shar (3.95 KB, text/plain)
2011-04-16 12:50 UTC, David Naylor
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Naylor 2011-04-16 12:50:06 UTC
THIS IS A ALPHA RELEASE ONLY.  NOT FOR GENERAL CONSUMPTION

A concurrent ports building tool.  Although FreeBSD ports supports building a
single port using multiple jobs (via MAKE_JOBS) however it cannot build
multiple ports concurrently.  This tool accomplishes just that.

Some of its key features:
 * Concurrent port building
 * Load control
 * Top like UI
 * Persistent builds (by default)

Fix: Patch attached with submission follows:
Comment 1 Max Brazhnikov freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2011-04-17 16:17:56 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->makc

I'll take it.
Comment 2 Max Brazhnikov 2011-04-24 22:56:40 UTC
Hi David,

I'm resisting to add a port with -devel suffix when there is no stable port. Maybe a note for users that the port is for testing purpose only would be better than devel suffix in portname? 

Max
Comment 3 David Naylor 2011-04-25 23:25:07 UTC
Hi Max,

In theory the port will eventually evolve into having stable and -devel 
port...

I do not have a problem if the -devel suffix is dropped.  The plan is to keep 
very quiet about this port until it is ready for wider testing, the ETA on 
that is with the next quarterly status update.  

Regards

On Sunday 24 April 2011 23:56:40 Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> I'm resisting to add a port with -devel suffix when there is no stable
> port. Maybe a note for users that the port is for testing purpose only
> would be better than devel suffix in portname?
> 
> Max
Comment 4 dfilter service freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2011-04-30 10:54:28 UTC
makc        2011-04-30 09:54:14 UTC

  FreeBSD ports repository

  Added files:
    ports-mgmt/portbuilder Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist 
  Log:
  Add new port ports-mgmt/portbuilder:
  
  A concurrent ports building tool.  Although FreeBSD ports supports building a
  single port using multiple jobs (via MAKE_JOBS) however it cannot build
  multiple ports concurrently.  This tool accomplishes just that.
  
  Some of its key features:
   * Concurrent port building
   * Load control
   * Top like UI
   * Persistent builds (by default)
  
  WWW: http://github.com/DragonSA/portbuilder/
  
  PR:             ports/156441
  Submitted by:   David Naylor <naylor.b.david at gmail.com>
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.1       +21 -0     ports/ports-mgmt/portbuilder/Makefile (new)
  1.1       +2 -0      ports/ports-mgmt/portbuilder/distinfo (new)
  1.1       +11 -0     ports/ports-mgmt/portbuilder/pkg-descr (new)
  1.1       +48 -0     ports/ports-mgmt/portbuilder/pkg-plist (new)
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Comment 5 Max Brazhnikov freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2011-04-30 10:56:29 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

New port added as ports-mgmt/portbuilder. Thanks!