Update devel/py-robotframework from version 2.8.2 to 2.8.3. This a bug fixing update, mostly about java. An important note. With stage allowed, at least one file (islike.py) is not installed. I'm not sure if this deserves a separate PR... Fix: Patch attached with submission follows:
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-python freebsd-python@ wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
Sorry, I forget to update plist. Corrected patch attached. -- Vladimir Chukharev
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-python->wg I'll take it.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, with minor changes. Thanks!
Author: wg Date: Fri Dec 6 12:32:18 2013 New Revision: 335741 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/335741 Log: devel/py-robotframework: update to 2.8.3 PR: ports/184523 Submitted by: maintainer Deleted: head/devel/py-robotframework/pkg-plist Modified: head/devel/py-robotframework/Makefile head/devel/py-robotframework/distinfo Modified: head/devel/py-robotframework/Makefile ============================================================================== --- head/devel/py-robotframework/Makefile Fri Dec 6 12:25:48 2013 (r335740) +++ head/devel/py-robotframework/Makefile Fri Dec 6 12:32:18 2013 (r335741) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ # $FreeBSD$ PORTNAME= robotframework -PORTVERSION= 2.8.2 +PORTVERSION= 2.8.3 CATEGORIES= devel www python MASTER_SITES= CHEESESHOP PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@ LICENSE= AL2 USE_PYTHON= -2.7 USE_PYDISTUTILS=yes +PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST= yes .include <bsd.port.mk> Modified: head/devel/py-robotframework/distinfo ============================================================================== --- head/devel/py-robotframework/distinfo Fri Dec 6 12:25:48 2013 (r335740) +++ head/devel/py-robotframework/distinfo Fri Dec 6 12:32:18 2013 (r335741) @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (robotframework-2.8.2.tar.gz) = da1cb3318a349a7c359a4f0c78d75c87561791f12235dc48551400bee2bf6c5f -SIZE (robotframework-2.8.2.tar.gz) = 568721 +SHA256 (robotframework-2.8.3.tar.gz) = bb8ca9bad5152a3ac19e4dfc6e097324b31a4a8879d66c268e61d3eb577fd2f4 +SIZE (robotframework-2.8.3.tar.gz) = 570523 _______________________________________________ svn-ports-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-ports-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
wg@, thanks for committing. Frankly speaking, I do not think a change from static pkg-plist to a dynamic one is a minor change... The port works fine with a corrected static plist and no NO_STAGE line, I have checked that. Do I understand correctly, that a port without NO_STAGE=yes uses pkg-plist for installing from the stage dir to the destination dir? If so, then dynamic plist can be used to find the list of installed files for pkg-plist generation, but is not needed in normal use. Previously, I used 'port test' (from ports-mgmt/porttools) to find changes in plist. Probably, porttools can be fixed for this task also with staging. Else, a maintainer (me in case of devel/py-robotframework) can use dynamic plist for generating the static one. I still believe a static plist is better, as the porters-handbook suggests. It would be nice to have something about staging in porters-handbook, actually. Now I'm guessing what staging is doing and what it needs... -- Vladimir Chukharev
My version of porters-handbook was too old. The new one has all the needed information on staging IMHO. -- Vladimir Chukharev