Have you any questions contact me. I'll change this port as much as it'll be needed. Porting this thing was a nightmare. It doesn't use any wise concept at all! The one thing I doubt is WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR} because the distfile unpacking directly to . Fix: Patch attached with submission follows:
Hi, if you are still interested in having this port in FreeBSD, it may (or may not) need to be reworked to support stage, and it may need updating to other newer conventions such as "USES" which is expanding all time. For staging, see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-announce/2014-May/000080.html Additionally, you need to provide some sort of quality assurance. In order of preference, we are looking for: 1) "poudriere testport" or "poudriere bulk -t" logs 2) Redports or tinderbox logs Please provide an updated shar file and attach a test log. Alternatively, please indicate if you are no longer interested in having this software in the Ports Collection and that we can close the PR. Thanks!
This is staged, but bit-rotted (python, wx) The extraction is probably bad, submitter should use www/siteframe as an example of how to deal with extracting directly into $WRKDIR This PR needs new submission and testlogs, otherwise the PR isn't going anywhere.
Created attachment 146489 [details] new shar file, and poudriere log
Created attachment 146490 [details] and poudriere
(In reply to John Marino from comment #2) > This is staged, but bit-rotted (python, wx) > > The extraction is probably bad, submitter should use www/siteframe as an > example of how to deal with extracting directly into $WRKDIR > > > This PR needs new submission and testlogs, otherwise the PR isn't going > anywhere. Done. There was a bug which I've missed. Are poudriere logs are mandatory now?
technically, not yet, but it bumped you to the front on the line. The poudriere log is just a regular poudriere run, right? not poudriere testport, nor "poudriere bulk -t" ? I don't see the stage-qa checks in the log
(In reply to John Marino from comment #6) > technically, not yet, but it bumped you to the front on the line. > > The poudriere log is just a regular poudriere run, right? not poudriere > testport, nor "poudriere bulk -t" ? I don't see the stage-qa checks in the > log I'm relatively new to the poudriere building. I used this command: poudriere bulk -j 10x64 security/webshag
(In reply to clutton from comment #7) > I'm relatively new to the poudriere building. I used this command: > poudriere bulk -j 10x64 security/webshag Just run it again with with -t, like this: poudriere bulk -j 10x64 -t security/webshag
Created attachment 146512 [details] new log (with -t)
Thanks. I'm going to ignore this warnings: Warning: Possibly owned by dependency: @dirrmtry %%PYTHON_SITELIBDIR%% Warning: Possibly owned by dependency: @dirrmtry %%PYTHON_LIBDIR%% They could be from helpers. Move to patch-ready status
A commit references this bug: Author: cs Date: Sat Sep 6 07:46:59 UTC 2014 New revision: 367404 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/367404 Log: Webshag is a multi-threaded, multi-platform web server audit tool. Written in Python, it gathers commonly useful functionalities for web server auditing like website crawling, URL scanning or file fuzzing. WWW: http://www.scrt.ch/en/attack/downloads/webshag PR: ports/187676 Submitted by: clutton@zoho.com Changes: head/security/Makefile head/security/webshag/ head/security/webshag/Makefile head/security/webshag/distinfo head/security/webshag/files/ head/security/webshag/files/patch-setup_linux_py head/security/webshag/pkg-descr head/security/webshag/pkg-plist
A commit references this bug: Author: cs Date: Sat Sep 6 07:50:14 UTC 2014 New revision: 45551 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/45551 Log: Add new contributor PR: 187676 Changes: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.xml
Committed with minor edits. Thank you very much.