Created attachment 147202 [details] www/mod_log_mysql diff accomodates recent changes to apache.mk www/mod_log_mysql adds apache22+ support bumps PORTREVISION nothing more, nothing less. :) See 2014-09-10.diff, attached. Thanks. --Chris
poudriere log, please.
A commit references this bug: Author: marino Date: Fri Oct 31 19:09:46 UTC 2014 New revision: 371882 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/371882 Log: www/mod_log_mysql: According to maintainer, it's okay for Apache 24 PR: 193545 Changes: head/www/mod_log_mysql/Makefile
It didn't need the revbump. Hopefully this fix is legit.
I add to revert it as it doesn't work
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #4) > I add to revert it as it doesn't work s/add/ask/ ? Why am I not surprised it doesn't work..
Chris, The change was reverted by antoine@. As the maintainer, you're expected to verify that it works as well as builds. The change I committed on your behalf broke with www/mod_log_config-st
(In reply to John Marino from comment #6) > Chris, > The change was reverted by antoine@. As the maintainer, you're expected to > verify that it works as well as builds. The change I committed on your > behalf broke with www/mod_log_config-st Sorry. I'm having difficulty following this thread. My build box crapped out. So I'll just revert all the 2.2 ==> 2.4 changes (see; repost original(s)) and revisit the 2.2 ==> 2.4 when I have a suitable development environment again. --Chris P.S. I have a submission from another person who added build/QA reports that seems to make this 2.2 && 2.4 capable. But didn't submit them, as I am not (yet) able to test them locally.
summary: 1) I changed the port to allow building on Apache 2.4 2) My commit was reverted less than 12 hours later because it effectively can't be used on apache 2.4 I don't know what you mean by "revert all the changes" There was a single line that changed and it was reverted already.
(In reply to John Marino from comment #8) > summary: > > 1) I changed the port to allow building on Apache 2.4 > 2) My commit was reverted less than 12 hours later because it effectively > can't be used on apache 2.4 > > I don't know what you mean by "revert all the changes" > > There was a single line that changed and it was reverted already. Thanks. --Chris