Created attachment 171033 [details] patch-server testbuilds, portlint look fine
Created attachment 171034 [details] patch-client
Making summary searchable by individual port names.
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #0 and #1) Seems okay for me :) But a point that i guess should be changed is omitting PORTREVISION?=0
Created attachment 171142 [details] patch for updating mysql57 port This patch does exactly like Kurt's patch but not using PORTREVISION?=0
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger) Will you commit it yourself ? [assuming you're a port-committer :D]
A commit references this bug: Author: pi Date: Wed Jun 15 05:40:38 UTC 2016 New revision: 416915 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416915 Log: databases/mysql57-{server|client}: 5.7.12 -> 5.7.13 Changes: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/5.7/en/news-5-7-13.html PR: 210042 Approved by: Mahdi Mokhtari <mokhi64@gmail.com> (maintainer) Changes: head/databases/mysql57-client/Makefile head/databases/mysql57-server/Makefile head/databases/mysql57-server/distinfo
The PORTREVISION? are placeholders and do not change the version string if =0. So I kept them in there.
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #7) > So I kept them in there. Okay, Thanks for explanation ;) Before now, i always deleted PORTREVISION in every upgrade of ports (because there's no diff to keep it or delete it) BTW, i see no problem to keep them too ;)