Created attachment 179596 [details] maintainer changed Hello. This is port yours, not my. Thanks for your learning.
I'm not taking the port. Are you releasing maintainership?
(In reply to John Marino from comment #1) I want to return the mechanism of bootstrap default by ccl. And to remove the dependency on legacy sbcl. You will be against?
Yes. You have no reason to do that. And you broke many ports the last time you did it. Building by CCL is still supported; you only have to change the option. For the SBCL option, the "legacy" sbcl is the correct way to build it.
(In reply to John Marino from comment #3) I do not like this approach. I am willing to make changes to the port even in this form, but do not want to be maintainer. I'm releasing maintainership.
Fine by me. If you still insist on your approach after breaking several ports and an entire platform (which signifies zero quality assurance was done on downstream ports) then it's best that the port returns to how it was before. The word "legacy" is wrong too. Right now the older bootstraps are sufficient. If they get too old, it's a simple matter of repackaging the latest SBCL from FreeBSD 10.3. This is the most correct method of building a compiler. You never gave your reasons for the change. I have to assume you just thought it was easier to maintain that way. Maintainership is hard sometimes.
A commit references this bug: Author: marino Date: Sat Feb 4 14:57:09 UTC 2017 New revision: 433314 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433314 Log: lang/sbcl: reset maintainer upon request PR: 216780 Changes: head/lang/sbcl/Makefile