Created attachment 195053 [details] knot 2.6.8 Yesterday a new version of knot2 was released. This patch updates accordingly. I tested it in poudriere agains amd64 and i386 on 10.4 and 11.1 It's known to fail in 12. But I hope that will be solved in time.
Landed. Thanks.
A commit references this bug: Author: joneum Date: Thu Jul 12 14:04:25 UTC 2018 New revision: 474517 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/474517 Log: dns/knot2: Update to 2.6.8 Changelog: https://www.knot-dns.cz/2018-07-10-version-268.html PR: 229701 Submitted by: Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd@dns.company> (maintainer) Changes: head/dns/knot2/Makefile head/dns/knot2/distinfo
The OP indicated that this is BROKEN on -CURRENT (12). Was this been fixed prior to commit? If not. Why is the BROKEN @VERSION not included in the Makefile? Thanks --Chris
(In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #3) http://joneumbox.org/data/12amd64-ports/2018-07-12_23h32m41s/logs/knot2-2.6.8.log For her. I tested it, and found no problem. Why these aggressive words?
(In reply to Jochen Neumeister from comment #4) > (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #3) > > http://joneumbox.org/data/12amd64-ports/2018-07-12_23h32m41s/logs/knot2-2.6. > 8.log > > For her. I tested it, and found no problem. Why these aggressive words? Thanks for the quick reply, Jochen! > Why these aggressive words? Maybe you are referring to the use of capitol letters in BROKEN, and CURRENT? If so. I used them that way, because this is the way they are used in the Makefile: # BROKEN - Port is believed to be broken. Package builds can # still be attempted using TRYBROKEN to test this # assumption. # BROKEN_${ARCH} Port is believed to be broken on ${ARCH}. Package builds # can still be attempted using TRYBROKEN to test this # assumption. I had no intention to sound angry. :-) I only wanted to know the status for 12-CURRENT -- or -current ;-) Thanks, again! --Chris