The example file ssmtp.conf.sample does not at all mention either STARTTLS or authentication for target MTAs, something which I assume is needed by many people. Would it be a good idea to at least add, in comments, an indication thereof? Something along these lines, maybe: --- ssmtp.conf.sample 2019-11-15 16:44:44.000000000 +0000 +++ ssmtp.conf.sample.new 2019-12-12 14:18:53.946701000 +0000 @@ -41,3 +41,11 @@ # If you want to have debugging of the config file parsing, move this option # to the top of the config file and uncomment #Debug=YES + +# Use these parameters for securely authenticating against your +# mailhub; check ssmtp.conf(5) for further details. + +# UseSTARTTLS=YES +# AuthUser=you@yourdomain.com +# AuthPass=your-secret-password + I'd also like to point out that the home page for ssmtp as recorded at [1] is no longer valid and seems to have moved to https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/ssmtp.html
(In reply to Jan-Piet Mens from comment #0) The patch should ideally be upstreamed.
A commit references this bug: Author: 0mp Date: Thu Mar 5 16:26:22 UTC 2020 New revision: 527841 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/527841 Log: Mention AuthUser/Pass in sample configuration file The example file ssmtp.conf.sample does not at all mention either STARTTLS or authentication for target MTAs. This patch fixes that. Also, update WWW. PR: 242602 Submitted by: Jan-Piet Mens <ports@jpmens.net> Approved by: aragon@phat.za.net (maintainer timeout) Changes: head/mail/ssmtp/Makefile head/mail/ssmtp/files/patch-ssmtp.conf head/mail/ssmtp/pkg-descr
Committed. Thanks!
(In reply to Mateusz Piotrowski from comment #1) I sent a message to the author in December, but it wasn't responded to.