Bug 42893 - Update port: textproc/aspell
Summary: Update port: textproc/aspell
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-ports (Nobody)
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-09-17 18:30 UTC by tkato
Modified: 2002-09-20 07:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
file.diff (1.81 KB, patch)
2002-09-17 18:30 UTC, tkato 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description tkato 2002-09-17 18:30:10 UTC 
- Support NOPORTDOCS properly

New file:
files/patch-Makefile.in

No response from mentainer.
Comment 1 Thierry Thomas 2002-09-17 18:45:05 UTC 
Le 17/09/2002 à 19:02:57 +0200, KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com> écrivait :
> 
> >Number:         42893
> >Category:       ports
> >Synopsis:       Update port: textproc/aspell

8<   8<   8<

> - Support NOPORTDOCS properly
> 
> New file:
> files/patch-Makefile.in
> 
> No response from mentainer.

Thanks, but it has been submitted in PR ports/42700.
-- 
Th. Thomas.
Comment 2 tkato 2002-09-17 21:04:14 UTC 
> Thanks, but it has been submitted in PR ports/42700.

Hmm, I misunderstood that ports/42700 has already been closed,
because several patches similar as included in that PR were
added into ports tree by sobomax@ (without regarding PR...).

Since ports/42893 is just the missing part between ports/42700
and current ports tree,  I supppse it's the best way would be
ports/42700 to close immidiately and ports/42893 to apply ASAP.
Comment 3 Thierry Thomas 2002-09-17 21:17:32 UTC 
Le 17/09/2002 à 22:04:14 +0200, KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com> écrivait :
> > Thanks, but it has been submitted in PR ports/42700.
> 
> Hmm, I misunderstood that ports/42700 has already been closed,
> because several patches similar as included in that PR were
> added into ports tree by sobomax@ (without regarding PR...).
> 
> Since ports/42893 is just the missing part between ports/42700
> and current ports tree,  I supppse it's the best way would be
> ports/42700 to close immidiately and ports/42893 to apply ASAP.

Agreed. I have already asked to close PR ports/42700 on Sat, 14 Sep 2002
11:49:55 +0200.

Regards,
-- 
Th. Thomas.
Comment 4 Ying-Chieh Liao freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2002-09-20 07:36:40 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

committed, thanks