The setiathome manual page refer to setiathome.conf while it is now named rc.setiathome.conf. also, the manual page has been completed (variables, start/stop scripts, etc.) Makefile PORTREVISION bumped pkg-install registration heuristic changed (don't register if already registered, then automatically start setiathome in either case) files/rc.setiathome.conf seti_proxy_args changed to seti_proxy_server seti_socks_server, seti_socks_user, seti_socks_passwd added seti_sleep changed to seti_sleep_time files/setiathome.1 /usr/local changed to %%PREFIX%% above and below changes described files/setiathome.sh same changes as files/rc.setiathome.conf su heuristic changed back from sh here-doc to sh -c due to unnecessary su process (not seen before) gracefull (aka apachectl :) option added using stop_after_send.txt How-To-Repeat: man setiathome
Hi, Cyrille! What about the exploit referenced by the FORBIDDEN message? Seems like you need to upgrade to 3.08 before removing the FORBIDDEN... Can you take a look at Brad Forschinger's PR 52297, please? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/52297 Seems like we need to incorporate his upgrade and merge your changes into that. You can send me the new patch and I'll commit that. Thanks! -mi
Cyrille! Your changes to the setiathome.sh startup-script now lead to shell errors on startup -- missing quote. I added the quote, and hit another error. I'll be sending you my update -- including the upgrade to 3.08 for FreeBSD in a separate e-mail. Please, take a look. As far as the new start-up script, I'm not sure it is worth the extra shells (per CPU) to run to automaticly restart setiathome if it exits. Even if you are convinced, such auto-restarting is desirable (I'm not), it should be one sleeping shell per machine -- not one per CPU, don't you think? My dual CPU box has four setiathome-owned processes runing instead of 3. Someone's 8-way monster will have 16 instead of 9 :-) Finally, with the amount of shell scripting required for this, may be, it would be easier to write the seti-helper in C? Yours, -mi
State Changed From-To: open->analyzed New version is out ( PR 52297 ) mi spotted errors in startup-script.
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 06:20:07PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Hi, Cyrille! > > What about the exploit referenced by the FORBIDDEN message? Seems > like you need to upgrade to 3.08 before removing the FORBIDDEN... this was a mistake. unfortunatelly, to build/test setiathome, FORBIDDEN must be commented and I forgot to uncomment it in the PR. also, at the time of the PR, 3.08 wasn't out yet. > Can you take a look at Brad Forschinger's PR 52297, please? > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/52297 this PR is malformed, I've not been CCed :( > Seems like we need to incorporate his upgrade and merge your changes > into that. You can send me the new patch and I'll commit that. done :) http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/52709 Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:00:42PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Cyrille! > > Your changes to the setiathome.sh startup-script now lead to shell > errors on startup -- missing quote. I added the quote, and hit another > error. I'll be sending you my update -- including the upgrade to 3.08 > for FreeBSD in a separate e-mail. Please, take a look. that part has been completly rewritten using an external wrapper... > As far as the new start-up script, I'm not sure it is worth the extra > shells (per CPU) to run to automaticly restart setiathome if it exits. ditto. > Even if you are convinced, such auto-restarting is desirable (I'm not), > it should be one sleeping shell per machine -- not one per CPU, don't > you think? My dual CPU box has four setiathome-owned processes runing > instead of 3. Someone's 8-way monster will have 16 instead of 9 :-) done. > Finally, with the amount of shell scripting required for this, may be, > it would be easier to write the seti-helper in C? too complicated... everything was done using our stock sh :) see you. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
State Changed From-To: analyzed->closed Update has beenn submitted, see ports/52709
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->dinoex I commited the pathc