Nowadays many ports use freetype2. This version of ttmkfdir avoids the installation of freetype1. Fix: - Repocopy x11-fonts/ttmkfdir to x11-fonts/ttmkfdir2; - apply the first patch; - apply the second patch (adds CONFLICTS to x11-fonts/ttmkfdir). Remark about the first patch: . added files: patch-Makefile patch-ttf.h . removed files: patch-ttmkfdir.c How-To-Repeat: N/A.
Any reason for keeping freetype1 ttmkfdir in the tree? Does it produce different output than freetype2 version? I just checked INDEX and only 5 ports have ttmkfdir as a dependency, and it's build-time dependency anyway. -- Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> <pav@oook.cz>
Le Lun 8 déc 03 à 23:59:18 +0100, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> écrivait : > Any reason for keeping freetype1 ttmkfdir in the tree? > Does it produce different output than freetype2 version? I just checked > INDEX and only 5 ports have ttmkfdir as a dependency, and it's > build-time dependency anyway. ttmkfdir2 fixes at least a bug (--default-foundry), and for my encodings it produces the same result. However, the original ttmkfdir might produce a different output for koi8-u (I'm not sure about it). Regards, -- Th. Thomas.
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav I'll handle this one.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks. Both me and marcus agreed on replacing old ttmkfdir instead of doing repocopy.