-Update to 0.9.8 -Remove the '-devel' (ex: $prefix/bin/fluxbox and etc) -Add CONFLICTS against x11-wm/fluxbox Fix: What have I done? - Remove the '-devel'; adamw@FreeBSD and I have agree that it's mature enough to be fluxbox. Also, we doubt that someone will install both fluxbox and fluxbox-devel at the same time. Because of the ~/.fluxbox that they can't be share. The CONFLICTS should be good enough until 1.0 is released. If you, the maintainer (Hendrik), don't agree with this remove of '-devel' then you can create a new diff of it. All you have to do is change the version and checksum, that's it, I think. - Re-order the NLSMAKEFILES, because it hurts my eyes when I am trying to compare to see if there has any new one. Now, it looks more clean for our eyes. :-) - Modified the pkg-message, explained about the removal of '-devel'. Please, do feel free to correct the English grammar if it needs. ;-) I think, I didn't leave anything so far. Here's diff. How-To-Repeat: n/a
Dear maintainer of port x11-wm/fluxbox-devel, please take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61714 Do you approve this update, and do you agree with -devel removal? -- Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> Pain clots and unformed lice pat this train.
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Asked maintainer for approval.
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav Watch'em.
>> (01.22.2004 @ 0249 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 22K: << > What have I done? > - Remove the '-devel'; adamw@FreeBSD and I have agree that it's mature > enough to be fluxbox. Also, we doubt that someone will install both > fluxbox and fluxbox-devel at the same time. Because of the ~/.fluxbox > that they can't be share. The CONFLICTS should be good enough until > 1.0 is released. >> end of "ports/61714: Update port: x11-wm/fluxbox-devel 0.9.7 -> 0.9.8, fix an evil memory bug." from Jeremy Messenger << Woah. Mezz, I'm really impressed! Good job with the fb-devel -> fb renaming! One thing though: stuff should be added to the pkg-message to caution people that their menus will probably need to be regenerated, because all references to fbrun-devel, etc. are going to fail. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:17:02 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> (01.22.2004 @ 0249 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 22K: << >> What have I done? >> - Remove the '-devel'; adamw@FreeBSD and I have agree that it's mature >> enough to be fluxbox. Also, we doubt that someone will install both >> fluxbox and fluxbox-devel at the same time. Because of the ~/.fluxbox >> that they can't be share. The CONFLICTS should be good enough until >> 1.0 is released. >>> end of "ports/61714: Update port: x11-wm/fluxbox-devel 0.9.7 -> 0.9.8, >>> fix an evil memory bug." from Jeremy Messenger << > > Woah. Mezz, I'm really impressed! Good job with the fb-devel -> fb > renaming! Thanks! :-) I was almost totally forgot about 0.9.8, which I had it for a week until I am getting few more emails from people last night and today, so I had finally create diff and sent it to PR. > One thing though: stuff should be added to the pkg-message to caution > people that their menus will probably need to be regenerated, because > all references to fbrun-devel, etc. are going to fail. Oh yeah, you are right. Does this new diff of pkg-message looks good? --------------------------new-fluxbox-devel.diff-------------------------- diff -ur fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-message fluxbox-devel/pkg-message --- fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-message Tue Nov 18 10:26:51 2003 +++ fluxbox-devel/pkg-message Thu Jan 22 11:58:16 2004 @@ -5,7 +5,16 @@ Check out the RoadMap on http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/roadmap.php for more information about upcoming versions. -ATTENTION: As of 0.9.6 the shell script 'startfluxbox-devel' has been added. +ATTENTION: Now, the -devel has been removed and the CONFLICTS to + x11-wm/fluxbox has been added. The x11-wm/fluxbox-devel + is stable enough to use daily and we doubt someone will + install both fluxbox and fluxbox-devel. + + Since, the '-devel' has been removed and I recommend + you to regenerated menu or edit the ~/.fluxbox/menu to + remove the '-devel' to make the things work correct. + + As of 0.9.6 the shell script 'startfluxbox' has been added. It should be executed instead of fluxbox itself from ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession. ******************************************************************************* --------------------------new-fluxbox-devel.diff-------------------------- Cheers, Mezz > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net > http://www.vectors.cx -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:44:49 +0100, Hendrik Scholz <hscholz@raisdorf.net> wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:49:12AM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >Fix: >> What have I done? >> - Remove the '-devel'; adamw@FreeBSD and I have agree that it's mature >> enough to be fluxbox. Also, we doubt that someone will install both >> fluxbox and fluxbox-devel at the same time. Because of the ~/.fluxbox >> that they can't be share. The CONFLICTS should be good enough until >> 1.0 is released. > > I'm fine with removing -devel as this should prevent -devel legacy > problems > when 1.0 gets released. > > I didn't have the time to test the patch nor will I have it in the next > few > hours as I just had a long flight and need to catch up on a bunch of > other > things (work). > Mezz: You've always been contributing to the fluxbox stuff and if you > like > feel free to maintainership! Yep, I would love to take the maintainership because it's fun! :-) pav, can you edit the maintainer before you commit it? Same with the new pkg-message too? Thanks Hendrik, pav and adamw! Cheers, Mezz > Thanks, Hendrik -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
>> (01.22.2004 @ 1302 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.5K: << > On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:17:02 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> > wrote: > >One thing though: stuff should be added to the pkg-message to caution > >people that their menus will probably need to be regenerated, because > >all references to fbrun-devel, etc. are going to fail. > > Oh yeah, you are right. Does this new diff of pkg-message looks good? > > --------------------------new-fluxbox-devel.diff-------------------------- > diff -ur fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-message fluxbox-devel/pkg-message > --- fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-message Tue Nov 18 10:26:51 2003 > +++ fluxbox-devel/pkg-message Thu Jan 22 11:58:16 2004 > @@ -5,7 +5,16 @@ > Check out the RoadMap on http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/roadmap.php > for more information about upcoming versions. > > -ATTENTION: As of 0.9.6 the shell script 'startfluxbox-devel' has been > added. > +ATTENTION: Now, the -devel has been removed and the CONFLICTS to > + x11-wm/fluxbox has been added. The x11-wm/fluxbox-devel > + is stable enough to use daily and we doubt someone will > + install both fluxbox and fluxbox-devel. > + > + Since, the '-devel' has been removed and I recommend > + you to regenerated menu or edit the ~/.fluxbox/menu to > + remove the '-devel' to make the things work correct. > + > + As of 0.9.6 the shell script 'startfluxbox' has been added. > It should be executed instead of fluxbox itself from > ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession. > ******************************************************************************* > --------------------------new-fluxbox-devel.diff-------------------------- >> end of "Re: ports/61714: Update port: x11-wm/fluxbox-devel 0.9.7 -> 0.9.8, fix an evil memory bug." from Jeremy Messenger << Since the '-devel' suffix has been removed, you should either use (scriptname) to regenerate the menu, or edit your ~/.fluxbox/menu and remove the -devel suffix from fluxbox program names. Or something. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:11:01 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> (01.22.2004 @ 1302 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.5K: << >> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:17:02 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> >> wrote: >> >One thing though: stuff should be added to the pkg-message to caution >> >people that their menus will probably need to be regenerated, because >> >all references to fbrun-devel, etc. are going to fail. >> >> Oh yeah, you are right. Does this new diff of pkg-message looks good? >> >> --------------------------new-fluxbox-devel.diff-------------------------- >> diff -ur fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-message fluxbox-devel/pkg-message >> --- fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-message Tue Nov 18 10:26:51 2003 >> +++ fluxbox-devel/pkg-message Thu Jan 22 11:58:16 2004 >> @@ -5,7 +5,16 @@ >> Check out the RoadMap on http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/roadmap.php >> for more information about upcoming versions. >> >> -ATTENTION: As of 0.9.6 the shell script 'startfluxbox-devel' has been >> added. >> +ATTENTION: Now, the -devel has been removed and the CONFLICTS to >> + x11-wm/fluxbox has been added. The x11-wm/fluxbox-devel >> + is stable enough to use daily and we doubt someone will >> + install both fluxbox and fluxbox-devel. >> + >> + Since, the '-devel' has been removed and I recommend >> + you to regenerated menu or edit the ~/.fluxbox/menu to >> + remove the '-devel' to make the things work correct. >> + >> + As of 0.9.6 the shell script 'startfluxbox' has been added. >> It should be executed instead of fluxbox itself from >> ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession. >> ******************************************************************************* >> --------------------------new-fluxbox-devel.diff-------------------------- >>> end of "Re: ports/61714: Update port: x11-wm/fluxbox-devel 0.9.7 -> >>> 0.9.8, fix an evil memory bug." from Jeremy Messenger << > > Since the '-devel' suffix has been removed, you should either > use (scriptname) to regenerate the menu, or edit your > ~/.fluxbox/menu and remove the -devel suffix from fluxbox > program names. Either looks good, I like add scriptname (fluxbox-generate_menu) in it so I like your better. :-) pav, do you want me to create a new full diff of fluxbox-devel? Just let me know. Cheers, Mezz > Or something. > > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net > http://www.vectors.cx -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:23:41 +0100, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > V Ät, 22. 01. 2004 v 19:20, Jeremy Messenger pÃÅ¡e: > >> pav, do you want me to create a new full diff of fluxbox-devel? Just >> let >> me know. > > Yes please that would ease my job a bit. Ok, here it is.. The full summary is: -Update to 0.9.8 -Remove the '-devel' (ex: $prefix/bin/fluxbox and etc) -Add CONFLICTS against x11-wm/fluxbox -Change maintainer to Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> I think, I didn't leave anything out so far.. Thanks! Cheers, Mezz -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed, thanks!