Bug 71696 - Repocopy/repomove lang/gcc35 -> lang/gcc40
Summary: Repocopy/repomove lang/gcc35 -> lang/gcc40
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Gerald Pfeifer
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-09-13 10:10 UTC by gerald
Modified: 2004-10-31 05:26 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gerald 2004-09-13 10:10:19 UTC
 	Please repycopy/repomove lang/gcc35 to lang/gcc40.

 	The next upstream release of GCC has been renamed from 3.5
 	to 4.0.  Since our gcc35 port has been marked BROKEN ever
 	since it has been updated, we should just rename it to gcc40
 	(or repocopy it to gcc40 and remove gcc35).

 	I (gerald@) am the maintainer of this port.

Fix: 

Repocopy lang/gcc35 to lang/gcc40.
Comment 1 Gerald Pfeifer freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-09-13 10:11:54 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr

portmgr turf.
Comment 2 Ceri Davies freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-09-14 11:12:14 UTC
Adding to audit trail, from misfiled PR ports/71716:

Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:57:07 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
Message-Id: <20040914035707.GA61459@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0409131104200.75276@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

 On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:07:31AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
 >  	Please repycopy/repomove lang/gcc35 to lang/gcc40.
 > 
 >  	The next upstream release of GCC has been renamed from 3.5
 >  	to 4.0.  Since our gcc35 port has been marked BROKEN ever
 >  	since it has been updated, we should just rename it to gcc40
 >  	(or repocopy it to gcc40 and remove gcc35).
 
 I think we should just 'cvs rm' lang/gcc35 and repo copy lang/gcc34 to
 lang/gcc40.  There isn't any real gcc35 history yet (as mentioned above),
 and GCC 4.0 logically follows GCC 3.4, so I think doing the repo copy
 this way is more logical.  It also makes the tags cleaner.
Comment 3 Kris Kennaway freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-10-15 22:40:05 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->repocopy

Repocopy request
Comment 4 Joe Marcus Clarke freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-10-16 06:08:51 UTC
Gerald, any comment on obrien's idea of copying gcc34 to gcc40?

Joe

-- 
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
Comment 5 gerald 2004-10-21 20:17:02 UTC
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> Gerald, any comment on obrien's idea of copying gcc34 to gcc40?

Yes. ;-)

Copying gcc34 (instead of gcc35) to gcc40 will be a bit more work for me, 
but I do not have a strong feeling either way, so let's follow David's 
advice.

Gerald
Comment 6 Joe Marcus Clarke freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-10-21 21:51:07 UTC
State Changed
From-To: repocopy->open

Repo-copy completed. 


Comment 7 Joe Marcus Clarke freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-10-21 21:51:07 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: portmgr->gerald

Repo-copy completed.
Comment 8 Gerald Pfeifer freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-10-31 05:25:30 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Port updated, and lang/Makefile as well as CVSROOT/modules adjusted. 
obrien was so kind and helped by removing the gcc35 port.