Bug 89823 - [MAINTAINER] mail/bogofilter: update to 1.0.0
Summary: [MAINTAINER] mail/bogofilter: update to 1.0.0
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Emanuel Haupt
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-02 01:30 UTC by Matthias Andree
Modified: 2005-12-02 13:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
bogofilter-1.0.0.patch (5.50 KB, patch)
2005-12-02 01:30 UTC, Matthias Andree 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Matthias Andree 2005-12-02 01:30:02 UTC 
- Update to 1.0.0
- skip t.lock3 which is prone to run out of retries on busy machines
- revise pkg-descr

Removed file(s):
- files/patch-tests-nolocalconfig (merged upstream)

Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.63
Comment 1 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-02 08:33:25 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ehaupt

Take.
Comment 2 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-02 08:37:20 UTC 
is there a particular reason why "PORTREVISION?=	0" is set?

Emanuel
Comment 3 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-02 08:39:21 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

Ask for maintainer feedback.
Comment 4 Matthias Andree 2005-12-02 11:55:11 UTC 
Emanuel Haupt schrieb am 2005-12-02:

> is there a particular reason why "PORTREVISION?=	0" is set?

Slave ports may use a different portrevision and I wanted to document
the default. Now that you're asking it doesn't appear to be necessary.
I don't mind if it's removed if all slave ports also have version 1.0.0
afterwards. (slave ports are bogofilter-qdbm and bogofilter-sqlite).

-- 
Matthias Andree
Comment 5 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-02 13:41:49 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: feedback->closed

Committed, thanks!