update to 5.97
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Please note that PR ports/92150 has just been submitted. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/92150 The FreeBSD port has so far only tracked production releases of ExifTool. Since the latest production release is 5.87, I think it's best to leave the port there until Phil designates the next production release. If there's a strong case to be made for having the intermediate versions as a freebsd port also, perhaps a p5-Image-ExifTool-devel can be considered. Comments? -- Tod McQuillin
On 1/23/06, Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > Please note that PR ports/92150 has just been submitted. > > > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/92150 > > The FreeBSD port has so far only tracked production releases of ExifTool. > Since the latest production release is 5.87, I think it's best to leave > the port there until Phil designates the next production release. > > If there's a strong case to be made for having the intermediate versions > as a freebsd port also, perhaps a p5-Image-ExifTool-devel can be > considered. > > Comments? > -- > Tod McQuillin > > Well, it's probably not just me who needs the features added since 5.87. Besides, the latest release cycles (5.67, 5.77, 5.87) show that a new release is due just around 5.97 and that there are usually no serious fixes going into the releases. I can't speak for the author, but if you ask me - a release day is when Phil takes his time and updates his cpan repo. I don't really think that we can keep up with the rate ExifTools minor versions are appearing, but my point is that there's no bad thing in picking up an early (pre-)release. Anyway, I'm ready to agree with you whatever you decide and I don't see a need for a second port.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Andrew P. wrote: > Well, it's probably not just me who needs the features added > since 5.87. Besides, the latest release cycles (5.67, 5.77, > 5.87) show that a new release is due just around 5.97 and > that there are usually no serious fixes going into the releases. > I can't speak for the author, but if you ask me - a release day > is when Phil takes his time and updates his cpan repo. Okay, well I don't feel so strongly about only tracking "production releases" that I want to make a big issue about it. So I'm fine with this patch if a ports committer agrees. -- Tod
On 1/24/06, Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net> wrote: > Okay, well I don't feel so strongly about only tracking "production > releases" that I want to make a big issue about it. > > So I'm fine with this patch if a ports committer agrees. > -- > Tod Thanks. And I'll try to slip in an additional patch as soon as release is announced to keep you happy :)
On 1/24/06, Andrew P. <infofarmer@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/24/06, Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net> wrote: > > Okay, well I don't feel so strongly about only tracking "production > > releases" that I want to make a big issue about it. > > > > So I'm fine with this patch if a ports committer agrees. > > -- > > Tod > > Thanks. And I'll try to slip in an additional patch as soon as > release is announced to keep you happy :) > It seems Phil doesn't rest a day. Here's a new patch - to v5.98. No packing list changes. http://proxy.gubkin.ru/myports/p5-Image-ExifTool.598.diff
5.99 is out, no plist changes http://proxy.gubkin.ru/myports/p5-Image-ExifTool.599.diff
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->lawrance Take it
State Changed From-To: feedback->feedback Doesn't fetch: ================================================================ ====================<phase 1: make checksum>==================== => Image-ExifTool-5.99.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from file:///distcache//. fetch: file:///distcache//Image-ExifTool-5.99.tar.gz: No such file or directory => Attempting to fetch from http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/. fetch: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/Image-ExifTool-5.99.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 866304, actual 878967 => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/modules/by-module/Image/. fetch: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/modules/by-module/Image/Image-ExifTool-5.99.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.cpan.org/pub/CPAN/modules/by-module/Image/. fetch: ftp://ftp.cpan.org/pub/CPAN/modules/by-module/Image/Image-ExifTool-5.99.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://www.cpan.dk/CPAN/modules/by-module/Image/. fetch: http://www.cpan.dk/CPAN/modules/by-module/Image/Image-ExifTool-5.99.tar.gz: Not Found ...
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed, thanks all!