Bug 98518 - Upgrade port devel/radrails to version 0.6.4
Summary: Upgrade port devel/radrails to version 0.6.4
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-05 08:10 UTC by alecn2002
Modified: 2006-06-06 18:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
radrails0.6.2-0.6.4.diff (3.16 KB, patch)
2006-06-05 08:10 UTC, alecn2002 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description alecn2002 2006-06-05 08:10:10 UTC 
Upgrade port devel/radrails to ver.0.6.4

File pkg-plist was deleted
Comment 1 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-06 15:21:10 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->itetcu

I'll take it.
Comment 2 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-06 16:35:25 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

Fails on 4.x: 
http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb/errors/4-STABLE-i386-myPT/radrails-0.6.4.log
Comment 3 alecn2002 2006-06-06 16:52:53 UTC 
FreeBSD 5.x is treated as "legacy version", should we care about 4.x at all?


>Synopsis: Upgrade port devel/radrails to version 0.6.4
>
>State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
>State-Changed-By: itetcu
>State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 6 15:35:25 UTC 2006
>State-Changed-Why: 
>Fails on 4.x:
>http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb/errors/4-STABLE-i386-myPT/radrails-0.6.4.log
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=98518
Comment 4 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-06 17:01:55 UTC 
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:52:53 +0400 (MSD)
"alecn2002" <alecn2002@yandex.ru> wrote:

> FreeBSD 5.x is treated as "legacy version", should we care about 4.x at all?


We're not forced to make ports build/run on 4.x, but we should mark
them BROKEN/IGNORE as appropriate.

Do you want me to mark it BROKEN on 4.x ?

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #327:
The POP server is out of Coke
Comment 5 alecn2002 2006-06-06 18:27:07 UTC 
>On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:52:53 +0400 (MSD)
>"alecn2002" <alecn2002@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD 5.x is treated as "legacy version", should we care about 4.x at all?
>
>We're not forced to make ports build/run on 4.x, but we should mark
>them BROKEN/IGNORE as appropriate.
>
>Do you want me to mark it BROKEN on 4.x ?

Yes, please
Comment 6 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-06 18:30:57 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: feedback->open

Feedback received
Comment 7 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-06 18:33:42 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed. Thanks!