When lighttpd is built WITH_CML=YES, the lighttpd cannot start because of load error of cml module. This error is came from the mistake of the LUA_LIBS flag in Makefile. Fix: .if defined(WITH_FAM)--XKKg4DYo7ppUU4BfRMkR2yLzay3MOnEZucU3DWHgen7CCZu4 Content-Type: text/plain; name="file.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="file.diff" diff -ru lighttpd.org/Makefile lighttpd/Makefile --- lighttpd.org/Makefile Sun Nov 26 20:02:49 2006 +++ lighttpd/Makefile Wed Nov 22 20:59:21 2006 @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ .if defined(WITH_CML) USE_LUA= yes CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-lua -CONFIGURE_ENV+= LUA_CFLAGS="-I${LUA_INCDIR}" LUA_LIBS="-L${LUA_LIBDIR}" +CONFIGURE_ENV+= LUA_CFLAGS="-I${LUA_INCDIR}" LUA_LIBS="-L${LUA_LIBDIR} -llua" .endif How-To-Repeat: # cd /usr/ports/www/lighttpd # make install WITH_CML=YES # vi /usr/local/etc/lighttpd.conf edit conf file to activate mod_cml # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/lighttpd.sh start
Dear maintainer of www/lighttpd, a PR has been submitted describing a problem with the port and is waiting for your feedback. Please see [1] for the actual PR. Regards, Stefan [1]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/105863
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainer's feedback.
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->laszlof I'll take it.
State Changed From-To: feedback->open Maintainer was reset.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed. Thanks!
mnag 2006-12-13 13:20:51 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: www/lighttpd Makefile Log: - Fix CML option using -llua. PR: 105863 Submitted by: Jun MUKAI <mukai___jmuk.org> Revision Changes Path 1.47 +1 -1 ports/www/lighttpd/Makefile _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Marcus Alves Grando wrote: | Synopsis: module load error occurs lighttpd WITH_CML=YES | | State-Changed-From-To: open->closed | State-Changed-By: mnag | State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 13 13:21:04 UTC 2006 | State-Changed-Why: | Committed. Thanks! | | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=105863 Can we please verify the 'Responsible' section of the PR, I did not take this PR just to have it hijacked by another committer. Thanks - -- - ----------------------------- Frank J. Laszlo laszlof@FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iQIVAwUBRYAHY61QwXwBI2DsAQhRsA/+LtDi/6FfC/Ezw6mA1P00VPL4UsIEt4e6 sPxnfhGxwr1dUqVzg3Vm9GLZs6Hh9MXpgAiG/GwdJx7VKeCBrG9w4KrjbyXBSyLh RD16hdY2PIqyTaf1HYfqBoYUuEnMqD8bDrAFsPeidondtcG9z6WFGSyfzvvCtm6n /QOHIw69D/lkP1hWv0A53iwt+1Kbwg4dGSEKV6lM53aDTyp312h2Ik6/Tn5g1QT/ PTDShCJE6uWWjVDbwB8nIQlPrmQJYcpOH18N5IkyUelFvzuRhsyqwdvGDFp8TkX1 yyoaKYfKOlEb57r1ZfJBdUIz/rLW8/PxZzDFSeZCnMPOFlgcw9OwbNGV9oACc7tN 4dhm3IyD+mivRMkUl20mlNkZPV1VArrFAQO+bLctRwDFRYoQZMH0fbhNUwwNiwx+ VxdUmQnbaj03dPGKchh01rPZYAcrZMqYY9hgTJJPlQ2I7Hpr5dewOySi2P7FlGPs 7efYpw+nD1MjbUPiPmux9fQY2Axxc1uNUSDbEzLDOxvQ7LB/g7aJfR7G9mGgle3a euOG0dK+XObZB60gyw1dnQZf0jm90ybvvw55Rr8otkJS0mjRVi7NEAJUxuA28kBY qDSfJL+uDCF29SmPwheY73o4xzFLvyccNulc+Hy40S3ejwDWTKK7QgeBCKXZ5CLN 3le5WAqS3IM= =2041 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Marcus Alves Grando wrote: > | Synopsis: module load error occurs lighttpd WITH_CML=YES > | > | State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > | State-Changed-By: mnag > | State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 13 13:21:04 UTC 2006 > | State-Changed-Why: > | Committed. Thanks! > | > | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=105863 > > > Can we please verify the 'Responsible' section of the PR, I did not take > this PR just to have it hijacked by another committer. Thanks I'm a new port maintainer of lighttpd. And theoretically i can't see any problem to take pr's affecting my ports. Right? Another point is after 14 days you can commit PR to maintainer timeout. Old maintainer are asked for approval in "Sun Nov 26 12:12:36 UTC 2006". Theoretically you could have commited in Nov, 10. Regards -- Marcus Alves Grando marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br | Grupos Internet S/A mnag(at)FreeBSD.org | FreeBSD.org
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:13:17PM -0200, Marcus Alves Grando wrote: > I'm a new port maintainer of lighttpd. And theoretically i can't see any > problem to take pr's affecting my ports. Right? > > Another point is after 14 days you can commit PR to maintainer timeout. > Old maintainer are asked for approval in "Sun Nov 26 12:12:36 UTC 2006". > Theoretically you could have commited in Nov, 10. Yes, but since the PR was already assigned to someone else, it would have been more polite to ask. mcl
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:13:17PM -0200, Marcus Alves Grando wrote: >> I'm a new port maintainer of lighttpd. And theoretically i can't see any >> problem to take pr's affecting my ports. Right? >> >> Another point is after 14 days you can commit PR to maintainer timeout. >> Old maintainer are asked for approval in "Sun Nov 26 12:12:36 UTC 2006". >> Theoretically you could have commited in Nov, 10. > > Yes, but since the PR was already assigned to someone else, it would have > been more polite to ask. Sorry. I will ask. Btw. If that's happened to me, i don't care, because it's too increase FreeBSD ports. ;) Regards > > mcl -- Marcus Alves Grando marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br | Grupos Internet S/A mnag(at)FreeBSD.org | FreeBSD.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Marcus Alves Grando wrote: | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: | | I'm a new port maintainer of lighttpd. And theoretically i can't see any | problem to take pr's affecting my ports. Right? | | Another point is after 14 days you can commit PR to maintainer timeout. | Old maintainer are asked for approval in "Sun Nov 26 12:12:36 UTC 2006". | Theoretically you could have commited in Nov, 10. | | Regards | There is no audit trail (other than viewing the commit diff's) that you were taking maintainership of this port. In the future I would suggest at least pinging the responsible party letting them know your intentions. Also making a note of this in the PR would also be helpful. A system without checks and balances is just chaos. - -- - ----------------------------- Frank J. Laszlo laszlof@FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iQIVAwUBRYAN3a1QwXwBI2DsAQh38w//e+PxkNlUpo9Rt2+AL5FEpjzpvS2irn3H L12N+8eO7TZ0/OxZUaF54ZO38AkI11ZdWT6SG2eWRostJyKZDmhFHqSMczmOHP7X XEaMup2fQ4hMpZ/bQmmm/g0q9W6aHHn03ugcgW22FQXS9xLIWlcVam0xpjPpLXtj Y6Fx6l4ROA166DDiykw0cRJlXbELHvEOJeXV51VGCKisALVqF8Nc/4eTYRaRt0vh QSSnqr0E0ymh+OjvfzkqaZwQhmmMjssqIxMF4BgVd6ksc7x6nVFASL86CUy4fTBW f+S2WXVVCvNYbpiO0/UJWaIVUzVck7AbQDnGFgdGId/AAf04djiSnFly5+Bo3ukU Oodq0ceqrqajznEzS66BgIY/ljrTXP0IBjRTSc9uoVQYs2m6F/4Gjydp7XGO4LjY 4iC1fGjpwXibk+1v0Joj7wlW3PEUDxcGX1OaYWxBtmozCKtJgeiFmMtkkv5h/S0a 7KiaB982rEDpeEFV2mTx3M+1W8SNA9cC1SfLUo6zjt+39Cv9UI9pcQ8CDTcfiZX5 oyF+icf4i7CH6ld0fn7IyG+66WmvQTcE0382Nj3y8gBjCWIfYIgvVakR14n/iG/Z CspTwWmAgyOspCMnCaGkARqoYCiqIx/kQ/1ZMUnXteWMk3LCstsV0r3aNHTvhh+C +KkbHba6LkA= =wlDZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Marcus Alves Grando wrote: > | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > > | > | I'm a new port maintainer of lighttpd. And theoretically i can't see any > | problem to take pr's affecting my ports. Right? > | > | Another point is after 14 days you can commit PR to maintainer timeout. > | Old maintainer are asked for approval in "Sun Nov 26 12:12:36 UTC 2006". > | Theoretically you could have commited in Nov, 10. > | > | Regards > | > > There is no audit trail (other than viewing the commit diff's) that you > were taking maintainership of this port. In the future I would suggest > at least pinging the responsible party letting them know your > intentions. Also making a note of this in the PR would also be helpful. > A system without checks and balances is just chaos. I agree. And sorry for the problem caused. Regards -- Marcus Alves Grando marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br | Grupos Internet S/A mnag(at)FreeBSD.org | FreeBSD.org