Git now is at 1.6.2.5 [1]. Fix: The following patch updates the port and adds a list of kernel.org mirrors. If the patch will be accepted, I am planning to insert MASTER_SITE_KERNEL_ORG to all ports that download files from there. How-To-Repeat: [1] http://git-scm.org/
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->wxs Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:36:07PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > The following patch updates the port and adds a list of kernel.org > mirrors. If the patch will be accepted, I am planning to insert > MASTER_SITE_KERNEL_ORG to all ports that download files from there. What is the number of ports that download from these mirrors? If it's a small number I don't think we should bother with this. As for the git update, I already had it going through my tinderbox and intend to commit it in a day or two (I'm traveling for work right now). -- WXS
Wesley, good day. Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:59:58AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:36:07PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > The following patch updates the port and adds a list of kernel.org > > mirrors. If the patch will be accepted, I am planning to insert > > MASTER_SITE_KERNEL_ORG to all ports that download files from there. > > What is the number of ports that download from these mirrors? If it's a > small number I don't think we should bother with this. Not so many -- only 14: ----- comms/openobex devel/cgit devel/dit devel/libpci ftp/tftp-hpa misc/ddate net/tftp-hpa net-mgmt security/linux-pam-docs sysutils/linrename sysutils/linuxfdisk sysutils/pciutils sysutils/syslinux sysutils/zisofs-tools ----- But kernel.org is a known large resource that has a large network of mirrors, so why not utilize them in a centralized way? What worries you about the addition of another MASTER_SITE_* variable? This will make life more easier, because this variable introduces good metadata: this port sources are mirrored on the kernel.org. By the way, we have MASTER_SITE_OPENBSD and only 3 ports that currently utilize this variable. > As for the git update, I already had it going through my tinderbox and > intend to commit it in a day or two (I'm traveling for work right now). Cool, thanks. -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ #
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:28:18PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Wesley, good day. > > Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:59:58AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:36:07PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > The following patch updates the port and adds a list of kernel.org > > > mirrors. If the patch will be accepted, I am planning to insert > > > MASTER_SITE_KERNEL_ORG to all ports that download files from there. > > > > What is the number of ports that download from these mirrors? If it's a > > small number I don't think we should bother with this. > > Not so many -- only 14: > ----- > comms/openobex > devel/cgit > devel/dit > devel/libpci > ftp/tftp-hpa > misc/ddate > net/tftp-hpa > net-mgmt > security/linux-pam-docs > sysutils/linrename > sysutils/linuxfdisk > sysutils/pciutils > sysutils/syslinux > sysutils/zisofs-tools > ----- > But kernel.org is a known large resource that has a large network of > mirrors, so why not utilize them in a centralized way? What worries > you about the addition of another MASTER_SITE_* variable? This will > make life more easier, because this variable introduces good metadata: > this port sources are mirrored on the kernel.org. I agree with you completely. I was mostly just curious if the amount of effort (granted, it is very small) to add a new MASTER_SITE list is worth it. I will make the change to bsd.sites.mk when I return from traveling for work (in about a week). -- WXS
Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:18:11PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:28:18PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > Not so many -- only 14: > > ----- > > comms/openobex > > devel/cgit > > devel/dit > > devel/libpci > > ftp/tftp-hpa > > misc/ddate > > net/tftp-hpa > > net-mgmt > > security/linux-pam-docs > > sysutils/linrename > > sysutils/linuxfdisk > > sysutils/pciutils > > sysutils/syslinux > > sysutils/zisofs-tools > > ----- > > But kernel.org is a known large resource that has a large network of > > mirrors, so why not utilize them in a centralized way? What worries > > you about the addition of another MASTER_SITE_* variable? This will > > make life more easier, because this variable introduces good metadata: > > this port sources are mirrored on the kernel.org. > > I agree with you completely. I was mostly just curious if the amount of > effort (granted, it is very small) to add a new MASTER_SITE list is > worth it. I will make the change to bsd.sites.mk when I return from > traveling for work (in about a week). Thanks! I will try to prepare and test patches for all mentioned ports and will prepare another PR after your commit. -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ #
wxs 2009-05-05 18:43:57 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: devel/git Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Log: - Update to 1.6.2.5 Changelog: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/RelNotes-1.6.2.5.txt PR: ports/134232 Submitted by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> Revision Changes Path 1.52 +1 -1 ports/devel/git/Makefile 1.33 +9 -9 ports/devel/git/distinfo 1.28 +1 -0 ports/devel/git/pkg-plist _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <THpDke7OJ74sY88GKRGcSArVWPo@AbNt2aYVonA6XSQc9As8EVwIk24> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:42:17PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:18:11PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:28:18PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > Not so many -- only 14: > > > ----- > > > comms/openobex > > > devel/cgit > > > devel/dit > > > devel/libpci > > > ftp/tftp-hpa > > > misc/ddate > > > net/tftp-hpa > > > net-mgmt > > > security/linux-pam-docs > > > sysutils/linrename > > > sysutils/linuxfdisk > > > sysutils/pciutils > > > sysutils/syslinux > > > sysutils/zisofs-tools > > > ----- > > > But kernel.org is a known large resource that has a large network of > > > mirrors, so why not utilize them in a centralized way? What worries > > > you about the addition of another MASTER_SITE_* variable? This will > > > make life more easier, because this variable introduces good metadata: > > > this port sources are mirrored on the kernel.org. > > > > I agree with you completely. I was mostly just curious if the amount of > > effort (granted, it is very small) to add a new MASTER_SITE list is > > worth it. I will make the change to bsd.sites.mk when I return from > > traveling for work (in about a week). > > Thanks! I will try to prepare and test patches for all mentioned ports > and will prepare another PR after your commit. Please CC me directly on the PR so that I can handle it. -- WXS
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed. Thanks!
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <THpDke7OJ74sY88GKRGcSArVWPo@AbNt2aYVonA6XSQc9As8EVwIk24> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:42:17PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:18:11PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:28:18PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > Not so many -- only 14: > > > ----- > > > comms/openobex > > > devel/cgit > > > devel/dit > > > devel/libpci > > > ftp/tftp-hpa > > > misc/ddate > > > net/tftp-hpa > > > net-mgmt > > > security/linux-pam-docs > > > sysutils/linrename > > > sysutils/linuxfdisk > > > sysutils/pciutils > > > sysutils/syslinux > > > sysutils/zisofs-tools > > > ----- > > > But kernel.org is a known large resource that has a large network of > > > mirrors, so why not utilize them in a centralized way? What worries > > > you about the addition of another MASTER_SITE_* variable? This will > > > make life more easier, because this variable introduces good metadata: > > > this port sources are mirrored on the kernel.org. > > > > I agree with you completely. I was mostly just curious if the amount of > > effort (granted, it is very small) to add a new MASTER_SITE list is > > worth it. I will make the change to bsd.sites.mk when I return from > > traveling for work (in about a week). > > Thanks! I will try to prepare and test patches for all mentioned ports > and will prepare another PR after your commit. Forgot to mention in my previous reply that I did not make the bsd.sites.mk change yet. This should be tracked in that separate PR. Thanks! -- WXS