Bug 136730 - [MAINTAINER UPDATE] mail/postfix-postfwd: update to 1.14 + my mrcpt() patch
Summary: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] mail/postfix-postfwd: update to 1.14 + my mrcpt() patch
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-07-14 02:20 UTC by Sahil Tandon
Modified: 2009-08-14 21:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
file.diff (5.11 KB, patch)
2009-07-14 02:20 UTC, Sahil Tandon
no flags Details | Diff
postfix-postfwd.txt (5.16 KB, text/plain; charset=us-ascii)
2009-07-19 07:48 UTC, Sahil Tandon
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sahil Tandon 2009-07-14 02:20:01 UTC
From upstream changelog:

- feature: new compare operators 
- feature: added --nodaemon option
- code: non dns items first: if a rule contains dns and non dns items, the lookups will only be done if all non dns items matched
- bugfix: empty pcre with empty sender_(ns|mx)_names was parsed incorrectly.
- bugfix:  negated pcre items with '~=' operator were parsed incorrectly.

My patch:

I created a quick patch to add a new rate-limiting feature: mrcpt(), maximum recipients per time window.  It is disabled by default.  I've submitted this to the developer who is currently on holidays and has agreed to look at adding this feature upstream.

Fix: Patch attached with submission follows:
Comment 1 Edwin Groothuis freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-07-14 02:20:14 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->itetcu

itetcu@ wants his PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
Comment 2 Byung-Hee HWANG 2009-07-14 06:27:27 UTC
Still i did not testing with this patch. But the idea looks good. 
Actually i would like to give +1 this patch.. ;;
Comment 3 Sahil Tandon 2009-07-19 07:48:42 UTC
itetcu@,

This revision of the patch provides the same functionality but instead of
${DO_NADA} etc., I use the EXTRA_PATCHES= directive to selectively apply my
own mrcpt() patch.  I know this is not the situation for which EXTRA_PATCHES=
was designed, but it appears "cleaner" than the method employed in my
original diff.  Which (if any) way do you think is most appropriate?

Cheers,
Sahil
Comment 4 Martin Wilke freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-08-14 20:55:20 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed. Thanks!
Comment 5 dfilter service freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2009-08-14 20:55:27 UTC
miwi        2009-08-14 19:55:13 UTC

  FreeBSD ports repository

  Modified files:
    mail/postfix-postfwd Makefile distinfo 
    mail/postfix-postfwd/files pkg-message.in 
  Added files:
    mail/postfix-postfwd/files extra-patch-sbin-postfwd 
  Log:
  - Update to 1.14
  
  PR:             136730
  Submitted by:   Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net> (maintainer)
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.4       +21 -2     ports/mail/postfix-postfwd/Makefile
  1.4       +3 -3      ports/mail/postfix-postfwd/distinfo
  1.1       +42 -0     ports/mail/postfix-postfwd/files/extra-patch-sbin-postfwd (new)
  1.3       +1 -1      ports/mail/postfix-postfwd/files/pkg-message.in
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"