Bug 166655 - [MAINTAINER] www/gist: Fix distinfo
Summary: [MAINTAINER] www/gist: Fix distinfo
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Michael Scheidell
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-04-05 01:30 UTC by changlp
Modified: 2012-04-08 17:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
gist-3.1.0_1.patch (1.54 KB, patch)
2012-04-05 01:30 UTC, changlp
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description changlp 2012-04-05 01:30:04 UTC
- Fix incorrect distinfo

- Revise DISTNAME

Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.99
Comment 1 Michael Scheidell freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2012-04-05 06:37:02 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->scheidell

I'll take it.
Comment 2 Michael Scheidell freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2012-04-05 07:50:15 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed. Thanks!
Comment 3 dfilter service freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2012-04-05 07:50:22 UTC
scheidell    2012-04-05 06:50:08 UTC

  FreeBSD ports repository

  Modified files:
    www/gist             Makefile distinfo 
  Log:
  - Fix incorrect distinfo
  - Bump PORTREVISION because size of distfile changed radically
  
  PR:             ports/166655
  Submitted by:   Lung-Pin Chang <changlp@cs.nctu.edu.tw> (maintainer)
  Approved by:    Lung-Pin Chang <changlp@cs.nctu.edu.tw> (maintainer)
  Feature safe:   yes
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.8       +9 -5      ports/www/gist/Makefile
  1.5       +2 -2      ports/www/gist/distinfo
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Comment 4 Michael Scheidell freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2012-04-05 20:41:49 UTC
State Changed
From-To: closed->feedback

Reopening: 
A question has been raised about the 40x size increase in the distfile over the previous version.  You send in this pr since  
the distinfo file was broken, right?  Can you tell me how big the distfile was before the distinfo file was broken? and if  
possible, how was it broken? was it upstream? 
Can you outline, maybe what the changes were that caused this 40x increase in size of the distfile?
Comment 5 changlp 2012-04-08 15:43:49 UTC
Hi,

Sorry about my misunderstanding to the problem, the distinfo in
ports/166640 is correct.

It turned out to be that the distinfo I submitted in ports/166640 was
not commited with the Makefile change,

so after I did a portsnap and tried to install the port, it complained
about checksum error on the distfile.

This made me thought that I submitted distinfo for error version of
gist and that's why I decided to resubmit a version with correct
distinfo.


Currently there is no difference between using the tarball or fetch
the raw script from github since the content is identical,

but I'm going to install manpage for this script, (which I forgot to
submit with ports/166655) so using the tarball would be required in
the next few revisions.

Thanks!

--
Lung-Pin Chang =E5=BC=B5=E7=93=8F=E7=B9=BD

Wireless Internet Laboratory & Computer Center
Department of Computer Science
National Chiao Tung University
Comment 6 Michael Scheidell freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2012-04-08 17:38:27 UTC
State Changed
From-To: feedback->closed

Thanks, understood.