net/wackamole new version (2.15) added MASTER_SITES added stage support warning: the addition of this port requires that ports/188853 has already been committed. Please poke rm@ with a sharp stick, if it still hasn't yet been committed. :) Fix: commit the attached shar Patch attached with submission follows:
yay, it's already staged.
Must come as welcomed news, after the last few of mine you had to deal with. :) --Chris
tag 1: PORTREVISION set to 1 even though PORTVERSION is new (which resets PORTREVISION to 0) tag 2: The "Created by:" line should reflect the original submitter - FYI, since this is the third time I've seen that one tag 3: I spoke too soon on the staging, it looks like staging has been reverted (e.g. MAN* defintions have come back)
yeah, I'm not sure what's going on with these man pages, I put it back to how it was when it was staged. It looks like they don't need special handling.
two more things portlint would have caught: 4) whitespace after WWW in pkg-descr 5) Old-style LIB_DEPENDS which needed converting
A commit references this bug: Author: marino Date: Wed Jun 11 14:25:03 UTC 2014 New revision: 357481 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/357481 Log: Resurrect net/wackmole and upgrade version 2.14 => 2.15 This port was removed because it's dependency "spread" was removed. Spread has returned, and now this one returns with a new version. * maintainership passed to submitter (old version was not unmaintained) * pkg-descr rewritten, WWW updated * LIB_DEPENDS format updated * distfile mirror added * USES+= tar:xz used * patches regenerated PR: 189403 Submitted by: Chris Hutchison Fixes by: marino Changes: head/MOVED head/net/Makefile head/net/wackamole/ head/net/wackamole/Makefile head/net/wackamole/distinfo head/net/wackamole/files/patch-alarm.c head/net/wackamole/files/patch-config_gram.y head/net/wackamole/files/patch-configuration.c head/net/wackamole/files/patch-defines.h head/net/wackamole/files/patch-wackamole.c head/net/wackamole/pkg-descr
i'm still not sure what happened with the man page reversion, but it's fixed now.
(In reply to John Marino from comment #7) > i'm still not sure what happened with the man page reversion, but it's fixed > now. You are my hero. :) Thanks John, and again, sorry for all the bother. --Chris