Created attachment 167147 [details] poudriere log It seems like a simple update. Log from build is attached.
Created attachment 167148 [details] v0.4.0
Assign to maintainer/committer of py-letsencrypt and notify maintainer of py-acme.
Testing@work via poudriere on 93i, 10.2i and 10.2a
(In reply to Carlos J. Puga Medina from comment #3) py-letsencrypt and py-acme build fine :)
Comment on attachment 167148 [details] v0.4.0 Can't set maintainer-* flags without a <maintainer-email> value
A commit references this bug: Author: koobs Date: Fri Feb 26 12:41:46 UTC 2016 New revision: 409603 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/409603 Log: security/py-{acme,letsencrypt}: Update to 0.4.0 Common: - Update PORTVERSION and distinfo checksum (0.4.0) [1] - Update and sort RUN_DEPENDS to match setup.py:install_requires security/py-acme: - Update COMMENT to match setup.py:description= - Add LICENSE_FILE - Remove spurious USES=gmake dependency PR: 207306 [1] Submitted by: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj anongoth pl> [1] Approved by: koobs (maintainer, letsencrypt), cpm (maintainer, acme) Changes: head/security/py-acme/Makefile head/security/py-acme/distinfo head/security/py-letsencrypt/Makefile head/security/py-letsencrypt/distinfo
Committed with changes. Thank you for the submission Piotr :) Protip: For python port updates, its always worth checking setup.py or requirements files for changes in dependencies, as declarations change often, whether its additions, removals, or version specific updates. In this case py-openssl was missing from py-acme, and there was an apparently unnecessary dependency on gmake (anyone know why/how?) @Carlos, for future issues for ports you are maintainer of, don't forget to add maintainer-approval + on the attachment you approve. In letsencrypt/acme's case, we can set multiple (two) flags on a single attachment to declare maintainer approval from both yourself and I. Since you have special permissions on Bugzilla, it doesn't need to be set to ? <youremail> first, unlike non-committer maintainers.
@Carlos, ignore my last comment re maintainer-approval, the template bug in bugzilla made sure I didn't see that you had already set it :)
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #8) Thanks Kubilay :)