Created attachment 167663 [details] patch - Update to 0.4.1 - Update MAINTAINER to my @FreeBSD.org address
All builds are fine via poudriere on 9.3a+i and 10.2a+i.
Is this update dependent on Letsencrypt in that it that needs an approval from koobs@ or is the CC just purely for the CC? If there's no dependence then this is approved for commit.
(In reply to Jason Unovitch from comment #2) Yes, this update depends on letsencrypt :)
(In reply to Carlos J. Puga Medina from comment #3) Mainly, does letsencrypt need to update from version X to version X+1 to go along with this. If so we'll need the appropriate "depends on" or "blocks". However, given that it's just a patch level bump from 0.4.0 -> 0.4.1, I am assuming it would work without any letsencrypt changes.
(In reply to Jason Unovitch from comment #4) You're right. I assume that koobs@ will prepare letsencrypt update before I commit this PR.
(In reply to Carlos J. Puga Medina from comment #5) Ok, then once koobs@ has provided an approval this is ready for commit.
@Carlos, if you want to attach the letsencrypt update here and/or create a review in phabricator with both port changes I can review it there and you can commit both. Please include unit test confirmation too
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7) I'm willing to do it :)
Created attachment 167666 [details] py-letsencrypt patch - Update PORTVERSION and distinfo checksum (0.4.1)
All builds are fine: https://people.freebsd.org/~cpm/logs/py27-letsencrypt-93x32-default.log https://people.freebsd.org/~cpm/logs/py27-letsencrypt-93x64-default.log https://people.freebsd.org/~cpm/logs/py27-letsencrypt-10x32-default.log
Thanks Carlos. Can you confirm the test suites pass for both ports please. Also, for future issues, build logs as attachments or remote URL's are not needed. Instead just mention them in the issue description, or the phabricator review TEST PLAN section as follows: portlint: OK (summary output) testport: OK (poudriere: <versions>, <archs>, <options> tested) unittest: OK (summary output)
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #11) portlint(1) output for both ports % portlint -ac WARN: Makefile: no port directory /usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools${PYTHON_SUFFIX} found, even though it is listed in RUN_DEPENDS. 0 fatal errors and 1 warning found.
- py-acme unittest (OK) - py-letsencrypt unittest (OK)
Approved
A commit references this bug: Author: cpm Date: Thu Mar 3 05:42:15 UTC 2016 New revision: 410009 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/410009 Log: Common: - Update PORTVERSION and distinfo checksum (0.4.1) security/py-acme: - Update MAINTAINER to my @FreeBSD.org address PR: 207666 Approved by: junovitch (mentor), koobs (maintainer, letsencrypt) Changes: head/security/py-acme/Makefile head/security/py-acme/distinfo head/security/py-letsencrypt/Makefile head/security/py-letsencrypt/distinfo
It's done! Thanks Kubilay!