Created attachment 168505 [details] textproc_sigil.diff
Why not create a separate port for FlightCrew ? It looks like you're just building it on the side, without any links with Sigil at all.
- FlightCrew was a part of Sigil in previous versions. - Sigil would be the only consumer of FlightCrew at present. - Most of dependencies are shared between each of them. - Someone once told me that new addition (including repo-copy) of "no person claims the exclusive right" port is strictly prohibited. Since it is certain to be seen as somewhat eccentric design, I would like to resubmit the stripped-down version if you have difficulty in accepting the current state.
Mmmm, well, creating a new port is forbidden, yes, this is more of a split. Could you provide a new patch with the sigil port, and the FlightCrew new port ? (no need to open a new PR)
Also, I don't have difficulties with this version. I found something strange and asked about it, it's all :-)
Created attachment 168626 [details] textproc_sigil.diff It will take some more time to finish porting FlightClue. We had better focus on upgrading Sigil at the moment.
0.9.5 is already available. No plist changes since 0.9.4. https://sigil-ebook.com/2016/03/13/sigil-0-9-4-released/ https://sigil-ebook.com/2016/03/26/sigil-0-9-5-released/
Created attachment 168698 [details] textproc_sigil.diff Version 0.9.5 has been released.
Committed. Thanks!
A commit references this bug: Author: mat Date: Fri Apr 1 15:57:44 UTC 2016 New revision: 412359 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412359 Log: Update to 0.9.5. PR: 208213 Submitted by: tkato432 yahoo com Sponsored by: Absolight Changes: head/textproc/sigil/Makefile head/textproc/sigil/distinfo head/textproc/sigil/pkg-plist
Created attachment 169091 [details] textproc_flightcrew.shar Here is a experimental port of FlightCrew.
(bugzilla forces me to add a comment, so I'm adding a comment.)
Could you also provide a patch for sigil to use flightcrew ?
In this case, I suppose there is no need to change anything to sigil port. It would probably be enough to add conditional RUN_DEPENDS to flightcrew port when PLUGINS option is enabled. To tell the truth, I have been totally forgotten about that.