Created attachment 181861 [details] drac-1.12_9.patch Compliant with portlint @Sample aggregated
The opt_VARS usage seems dubious.
Created attachment 186111 [details] drac-1.12_9_2.patch The opt_VARS problem solved.
The opt_VARS usage is still wrong.
Created attachment 186162 [details] drac-1.12_9_3.patch How about this?
Feedback please!
(In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #5) Patch no longer applies cleanly and does way more than what's in the summary. LICENSE_PERMS are now more restrictive than before. Is redistributing the sources and a binary package of it no longer allowed? The license seems like a BSD4CLAUSE variant to me, so probably it's fine.
It is the question if it is not a deprecated port. Last version update is from 26 Mar 2003. Source only fetchable from distcache
(In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #7) Even more reason to get LICENSE_PERMS right. If it's supposed to be preserved we need to host the distfile somewhere else too. Without 'dist-mirror' it wouldn't even be in the distcache. I'm also ok with deprecating old unmaintained stuff though ;-)
A commit references this bug: Author: tobik Date: Tue Dec 25 07:22:49 UTC 2018 New revision: 488296 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/488296 Log: Deprecate mail/drac Upstream appears to be gone and the last release was in 2003. PR: 218723 Submitted by: w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at Changes: head/mail/drac/Makefile
(In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #7) Given lack of additional feedback I have deprecated it now.