Created attachment 187521 [details] textproc/jshon: Update to 20160111.2 patch [1] Greetings! This patch updates textproc/jshon from ports r412349 to the latest code (git:783d3bf from 2016-01-11) available from https://github.com/keenerd/jshon (linked to at http://kmkeen.com/jshon/). ZSH-completion has been introduced to—I have added an option for that, currently it is not selected by default (I have no idea if it should be selected by default). The output of »portlint -AC« with comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> WARN: Makefile: for new port, make $FreeBSD$ tag in comment section >> empty, to make SVN happy. >> WARN: Makefile: new ports should not be maintained by ports@FreeBSD.org. It is not a new port. ...... 0 fatal errors and 2 warnings found. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ »poudriere testport -P« output and »setenv DEVELOPER yes; make clean; make stage && make check-plist && make stage-qa && make package« output will follow shortly. For both cases (ZSH=on|off). Regards, Kalten
Created attachment 187522 [details] log: make.* output [1] ZSH=on
Created attachment 187523 [details] log: make.* output [1] ZSH=off
Created attachment 187524 [details] log: poudriere testport -P output [1] ZSH=on
Created attachment 187525 [details] log: poudriere testport -P output [1] ZSH=off
Committed. Do you want to take over MAINTAINER for this port?
A commit references this bug: Author: tcberner Date: Sat Oct 28 05:56:55 UTC 2017 New revision: 453046 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/453046 Log: Update textproc/jshon to 20160111.2 PR: 223280 Submitted by: kalten@gmx.at Changes: head/textproc/jshon/Makefile head/textproc/jshon/distinfo
(In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #5) > Committed. Thank you. > Do you want to take over MAINTAINER for this port? Uh—as I am too lazy regarding the ports I already am maintainer of, it does not sound wise :-( on the other hand: this port does not have a maintainer at the moment, and there seem to be hardly ever changes to the program code. Further more: if I should not be able to maintain the port properly in future cases, the requests would fall back to others anyway; if you want to bother to set me as the maintainer—please do. Regards, Kalten