Bug 225885 - mail/cclient: Unbreak with openssl-devel
Summary: mail/cclient: Unbreak with openssl-devel
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: Thomas Zander
URL:
Keywords: patch, patch-ready
Depends on:
Blocks: 228865
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2018-02-14 11:46 UTC by Bernard Spil
Modified: 2018-06-10 11:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
riggs: merge-quarterly+

Attachments
svn diff for mail/cclient (2.32 KB, text/plain)
2018-02-14 11:46 UTC, Bernard Spil 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Bernard Spil freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-02-14 11:46:54 UTC 
Created attachment 190610 [details]
svn diff for mail/cclient

```
lang/python34: Unbreak with openssl-devel

 - x509_st is opaque in 1.1.x

PR:
```

Use methods to access certificate properties, not direct access to struct.
Comment 1 commit-hook freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-03-10 14:45:26 UTC 
A commit references this bug:

Author: riggs
Date: Sat Mar 10 14:44:28 UTC 2018
New revision: 464076
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/464076

Log:
  Un-break with SSL OPTION (default)

  PR:		225885
  Submitted by:	brnrd
  MFH:		2018Q1

Changes:
  head/mail/cclient/Makefile
  head/mail/cclient/files/patch-src_osdep_unix_ssl__unix.c
Comment 2 commit-hook freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-03-10 14:57:37 UTC 
A commit references this bug:

Author: riggs
Date: Sat Mar 10 14:57:09 UTC 2018
New revision: 464077
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/464077

Log:
  MFH: r464076

  Un-break with SSL OPTION (default)

  PR:		225885
  Submitted by:	brnrd

  Approved by:	ports-secteam (riggs)

Changes:
_U  branches/2018Q1/
  branches/2018Q1/mail/cclient/Makefile
  branches/2018Q1/mail/cclient/files/patch-src_osdep_unix_ssl__unix.c
Comment 3 Dani I. 2018-03-27 05:17:00 UTC 
Please take a look at bug #226621 - looks like this PR caused a regression for multiple ports.