https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse Created for use on FreeBSD which lacks a native driver, but also functions as an alternative to the kernel drivers on Linux and macOS. This driver is read-only and cannot write to or damage the target filesystem in any way.
No patch/shar attachment. Please note that this project contains several bundled libraries that are already present in the ports system. Port versions should be used instead of the bundled versions.
A commit references this bug: Author: tobik Date: Tue Mar 13 12:26:32 UTC 2018 New revision: 464367 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/464367 Log: New port: sysutils/fusefs-hfsfuse FUSE driver for HFS+ based on NetBSD's kernel driver with modifications. This driver is read-only and cannot write to or damage the target filesystem in any way. hfsfuse also includes a standalone tool, hfsdump, to inspect the contents of an HFS+ volume without FUSE. WWW: https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse PR: 226244 Changes: head/sysutils/Makefile head/sysutils/fusefs-hfsfuse/ head/sysutils/fusefs-hfsfuse/Makefile head/sysutils/fusefs-hfsfuse/distinfo head/sysutils/fusefs-hfsfuse/pkg-descr
Added the port. In the future please don't create clickbait bug titles and make it clear in the title that this is a request to create a new port and not a submission of one. Thank you.
(In reply to Tobias Kortkamp from comment #3) My apologize. It was not my intention to create 'click bait'. It wanted to specify that it should be relatively easy/fast to create such port as it was FreeBSD focused, so I used the '[NEW PORT] sysutils/hfsfuse' title, what title should I use then to not create 'click bait'? I also thought that this will be useful for FreeBSD developers as they often use Macs for their laptops/desktops, so importing HFS data would be handy. Regards.