Please update to the latest 1.1.x, which includes functionality absent from 1.1.0h.
Hi Conrad, The port's name has become a bit of a misnomer. This is a release version that I'm sure some people use in the wild. I don't think it's wise to actually update it to a non-release version at this moment. Once OpenSSL 1.1.1 reaches release, I intend to update the -devel port to 1.1.1 as indicated in https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2018-March/112899.html I am running bulk builds on the ports tree with both -devel and -master (you can get the latest version from https://github.com/Sp1l/ports) to check for breakage. Additionally, work is being done to see if we can update OpenSSL in base to 1.1.1. Hope that helps. Keeping this in "Open" unless you wish to close it. Will refer to it once the port gets updated. Cheers, Bernard.
Thanks, that makes sense. Would it be possible to rename the existing port to openssl110 (that seems to be what it is?) and have a new openssl-devel (or openssl111-devel to avoid name conflict?) that tracks ongoing openssl work? Thanks!
Hi Conrad, Awaiting responses on the mailing-list https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2018-August/114105.html Don't want to kick other people in the shins :D Assume 1.1.1 will be available in some way in ports soon. Did you check if the openssl-master port from my private WIP repo is usable for you? Cheers, Bernard.
(In reply to Bernard Spil from comment #3) Thanks, Bernard! I haven't had a chance to try your WIP port yet.
Conrad, Bernard, is this not just a duplicate of PR228192? Or is there something different here I am missing? Thanks, Rod
(In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #5) I don't see how this is related to gnome-calculator.
(In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #5) 228192 reads "math/gnome-calculator: update 3.26.0 -> 3.28.1" for me :/ Tried to find it but failing... Hope you have the number somewhere?
(In reply to Bernard Spil from comment #7) Argg.. 228912: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228912
One bug is for base, the other is for the port. I don't know if we actually plan to try and ship 1.1.1 in base for 12.0, or just 1.1.0. If the latter, that doesn't help this bug. (And even if we actually ship 1.1.1 for 12.0, we still need a port version of 1.1.1.) So I don't think they're duplicates, exactly. I don't feel strongly one way or the other about tracking everything in the other PR. If you and Bernard want to do that, we can do that.
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #9) I see the difference now, and I'll leave it up to Bernard, since he is the one tracking and doing the sub bugs.
Requested some guidance from portmgr on the renaming. Hang in there folks!
*** Bug 229648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
A commit references this bug: Author: brnrd Date: Wed Sep 12 10:09:49 UTC 2018 New revision: 479592 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/479592 Log: security/openssl111: Add new OpenSSL port PR: 230679 Changes: head/security/Makefile head/security/openssl111/ head/security/openssl111/Makefile head/security/openssl111/distinfo head/security/openssl111/files/ head/security/openssl111/files/extra-patch-util_process__docs.pl head/security/openssl111/files/patch-config head/security/openssl111/files/pkg-message.in head/security/openssl111/pkg-descr head/security/openssl111/pkg-plist head/security/openssl111/version.mk
For your /etc/make.conf > DEFAULT_VERSIONS=ssl=openssl111
A commit references this bug: Author: brnrd Date: Wed Sep 12 13:53:58 UTC 2018 New revision: 479602 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/479602 Log: security/openssl111: Re-add OpenSSL 1.1.1 port - Don't break systems currently using openssl-devel - Both 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 are release versions - Too many ports currently fail to build with 1.1.x see https://wiki.freebsd.org/OpenSSL/1.1.1 - Allow porters to test their ports with 1.1.1 PR: 230679 Reported by: danfe, cy Changes: head/security/Makefile head/security/openssl111/ head/security/openssl111/Makefile head/security/openssl111/distinfo head/security/openssl111/files/extra-patch-test_testssl head/security/openssl111/files/extra-patch-util_process__docs.pl head/security/openssl111/files/patch-Configure head/security/openssl111/files/patch-Makefile head/security/openssl111/files/patch-RFC-5705 head/security/openssl111/files/patch-apps_s__client.c head/security/openssl111/files/patch-config head/security/openssl111/files/pkg-message.in head/security/openssl111/pkg-descr head/security/openssl111/pkg-plist head/security/openssl111/version.mk
Thanks!
A commit references this bug: Author: brnrd Date: Wed Sep 12 16:11:12 UTC 2018 New revision: 479614 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/479614 Log: security/openssl111: Re-add OpenSSL 1.1.1 port - Don't break systems currently using openssl-devel - Both 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 are release versions - Too many ports currently fail to build with 1.1.x see https://wiki.freebsd.org/OpenSSL/1.1.1 - Allow porters to test their ports with 1.1.1 PR: 230679 Reported by: mat Changes: head/security/openssl111/ head/security/openssl111/Makefile head/security/openssl111/distinfo head/security/openssl111/files/extra-patch-util_process__docs.pl head/security/openssl111/files/patch-config head/security/openssl111/pkg-descr head/security/openssl111/pkg-plist head/security/openssl111/version.mk