Created attachment 202589 [details] gtkdoc opt
Moin moin Could you elaborate why you don't want the docs :) Also, requires portrevision bump. mfg Tobias
(In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #1) Im never use docs that installed with ports. Are you sure about portrevision bump?
(In reply to rozhuk.im from comment #2) What I wanted to bring across is: bug reports are better with text :-)
Created attachment 202619 [details] gtkdoc opt bump port revision
A commit references this bug: Author: adridg Date: Sun Mar 10 14:16:14 UTC 2019 New revision: 495294 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/495294 Log: Add DOCS option to net-im/libsignon-glib. This makes the documentation optional (but defaults to on). Without the documentation, no gtkdoc needs to be built, and no Doxygen gets dragged in. The ports framework for --enable-<foo> doesn't help here, because that option is created by the gtkdoc autoconf macros, which we don't want to have involved. Use sed to comment out the offending bits. Patch considerably changed from the PR. PORTREVISION bumped because there's now options where there were none before, but the default package doesn't change at all. PR: 236259 Reported by: rozhuk.im@gmail.com Changes: head/net-im/libsignon-glib/Makefile head/net-im/libsignon-glib/pkg-plist
Committed with major changes.