Created attachment 211113 [details] patch error: ../../../../qtwebengine-everywhere-src-5.13.2/src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/zlib/arm_features.c:27:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'ID_AA64ISAR0_AES' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (ID_AA64ISAR0_AES(id_aa64isar0) == ID_AA64ISAR0_AES_PMULL) ^ ../../../../qtwebengine-everywhere-src-5.13.2/src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/zlib/arm_features.c:29:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'ID_AA64ISAR0_CRC32' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (ID_AA64ISAR0_CRC32(id_aa64isar0) == ID_AA64ISAR0_CRC32_BASE) ^ ../../../../qtwebengine-everywhere-src-5.13.2/src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/zlib/arm_features.c:26:20: error: expected readable system register id_aa64isar0 = READ_SPECIALREG(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1); ^ /usr/include/machine/armreg.h:61:19: note: expanded from macro 'READ_SPECIALREG' __asm __volatile("mrs %0, " __STRING(reg) : "=&r" (_val)); \ ^ <inline asm>:1:11: note: instantiated into assembly here mrs x19, (((3) << 19) | ((0) << 16) | ((0) << 12) | ((6) << 8) | ((0) << 5)) ^ The interface has changed a bit on -current.
Created attachment 211710 [details] patch regen
Approved-by: manu (mentor) When maintainer approved or after maintainer timeout. Add kde@ as assignee so they can approve.
A commit references this bug: Author: mikael Date: Fri Mar 6 11:53:26 UTC 2020 New revision: 527875 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/527875 Log: www/qt5-webengine: fix build on head-aarch64 The interface has changed on -current PR: 243657 Approved by: ade (on irc), manu (mentor) Changes: head/www/qt5-webengine/files/patch-src_3rdparty_chromium_third__party_boringssl_src_crypto_cpu-aarch64-linux.c head/www/qt5-webengine/files/patch-src_3rdparty_chromium_third__party_crc32c_src_src_crc32c__arm64__linux__check.h head/www/qt5-webengine/files/patch-src_3rdparty_chromium_third__party_skia_src_core_SkCpu.cpp head/www/qt5-webengine/files/patch-src_3rdparty_chromium_third__party_zlib_arm__features.c
Moin moin Sorry, I overlooked this one. A general rule: kde@ approves any ARCH-related fixes implicitely (as long as they don't break the others :-) ) mfg Tobias