Upstream here. uutils is the name of the org, coreutils is the name of the project. to differentiate, please call it: uutils-coreutils or rust-coreutils Freebsd is (almost) the exception (I made the same request for Gentoo) https://uutils.github.io/user/installation.html See https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/4397#pullrequestreview-1305997268
if you prefix this with bug report's title with sysutils/uutils: the maintainer will be automatically notified
thanks
^Triage: Assign to maintainer and add maintainer-feedback request. This usually happens automatically when the bug report summary is in the category/port: format at creation time.
A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8014b050aa2f5d3e016d48c98865eabb0e6b12fe commit 8014b050aa2f5d3e016d48c98865eabb0e6b12fe Author: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2023-02-22 16:26:36 +0000 Commit: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2023-02-22 20:51:41 +0000 sysutils/uutils: rename to sysutils/rust-coreutils PR: 269745 MOVED | 1 + sysutils/Makefile | 2 +- sysutils/{uutils => rust-coreutils}/Makefile | 3 ++- sysutils/{uutils => rust-coreutils}/distinfo | 0 sysutils/{uutils => rust-coreutils}/pkg-descr | 0 sysutils/{uutils => rust-coreutils}/pkg-plist | 0 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
will this be merged to quarterly?
No, new ports are not merged to quarterly.