- Update to 0.6.0 - Install example C programs
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:33:21PM -0000, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > > >Number: 47102 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] Update security/gnutls to 0.6.0 > >Originator: Sergei Kolobov [snip] > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/security/gnutls/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.1 > diff -u -r1.1 Makefile > --- Makefile 2003/01/07 14:02:30 1.1 > +++ Makefile 2003/01/15 13:32:11 [snip] > @@ -20,13 +20,15 @@ > > USE_LIBTOOL= yes > INSTALLS_SHLIB= yes > -CONFIGURE_TARGET= > +CONFIGURE_TARGET= --build=${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} > CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \ Do you really need to have a CONFIGURE_TARGET assignment at all? I think that bsd.port.mk provides a default value, that is exactly the one you use; is there a reason to override it? G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 The rest of this sentence is written in Thailand, on
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:22:55PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > -CONFIGURE_TARGET= > > +CONFIGURE_TARGET= --build=${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} > > CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \ > > Do you really need to have a CONFIGURE_TARGET assignment at all? I think > that bsd.port.mk provides a default value, that is exactly the one you > use; is there a reason to override it? Oops. Never mind. Of course it is not the same. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 Do you think anybody has ever had *precisely this thought* before?
On 2003-01-15 at 16:33 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:22:55PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > -CONFIGURE_TARGET= > > > +CONFIGURE_TARGET= --build=${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} > > > CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \ > > > > Do you really need to have a CONFIGURE_TARGET assignment at all? I think > > that bsd.port.mk provides a default value, that is exactly the one you > > use; is there a reason to override it? > > Oops. Never mind. Of course it is not the same. Just for the record - if I understand correctly, it is a "feature" of configure scripts generated by autoconf-2.5x+. Without this CONFIGURE_TARGET redefinition, configure will either produce an annoying (but harmless) warning message, or prepend a prefix to all binaries names (something like "i386-unknown-freebsd4.7"). Hopefully, bsd.port.mk will be updated soon to cope with this (and, I am sure, many other) autoconf-2.5x "features". AlanE, are you there? Sergei
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks