The shells/bash-completion port installs Ian Macdonald's programmable completion library for Bash 2.04 and above. This gives users context- sensitive tab-completion for such things as program arguments, SSH hostnames, NFS mounts, and so on.
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Patch in the port doesn't apply. ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for bash-completion-20030527 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to bash_completion.rej
I'v fixed patch-aa, added depends on shell/bash2, fixed pkg-message and tested. ---- Sem.
At 2003-06-04T14:36:19Z, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> writes: > I'v fixed patch-aa, added depends on shell/bash2, fixed pkg-message > and tested. Regarding the corrupted archive: Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that command to get it to do the right thing. Regarding the shells/bash2 dependency: Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base installations? Regarding the pkg-message: I tried to copy-and-paste from the pkg-message files from other ports that were apparently done incorrectly. Thanks for putting me on the right track. -- Kirk Strauser
Kirk Strauser wrote: > Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the > "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that > command to get it to do the right thing. I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something has changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA? > Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless > without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as > documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base > installations? Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash without putting path to it into $PATH. If so port will satisfied. But if the port will not found bash in $PATH it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's reasonable. --- Sem.
At 2003-06-05T23:08:45Z, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> writes: > I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something has > changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA? Actually, I used vim and send-pr to send the PR. However, I *did* do some copy-and-pasting in Konsole, and that might've been the problem. > Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash without > putting path to it into $PATH. If so port will satisfied. But if the port > will not found bash in $PATH it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's > reasonable. OK, I agree that's reasonable. -- Kirk Strauser
State Changed From-To: feedback->open Feedback was submitted.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Commited, thanks!