Should not drivel be listed in deskutils like other LiveJournal.com clients in ports tree?
State Changed From-To: open->feedback should this be a repocopy or just an additional category?
Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Should not drivel be listed in deskutils like other LiveJournal.com > clients in ports tree? > -CATEGORIES= www gnome > +CATEGORIES= deskutils gnome You can't do this, you will get a wrong PKGORIGIN, and pkg_* tools (and portupgrade) will be unable to handle the port. Either do CATEGORIES= www deskutils gnome or ask for a repocopy over to deskutils. -Oliver
State Changed From-To: feedback->repocopy maintainer favors a repocopy of www/drivel to deskutils/drivel
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr maintainer favors a repocopy of www/drivel to deskutils/drivel
State Changed From-To: repocopy->open Repo-copy completed.
Responsible Changed From-To: portmgr->eik Repo-copy completed.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks!