Bug 88250 - update misc/dnetc
Summary: update misc/dnetc
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody)
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-30 19:10 UTC by Andrew Pantyukhin
Modified: 2005-11-02 21:45 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
dnetc.diff (1.61 KB, patch)
2005-10-30 19:10 UTC, Andrew Pantyukhin
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Pantyukhin 2005-10-30 19:10:19 UTC
	- use a new binary on FreeBSD >= 5.3
	- a couple of minor fixes

Fix: There's no need to bump portrevision.

DISTNAME is changed late, but I didn't have a better idea,
OSVERSION is set in bsd.port.pre.mk.
Comment 1 Edwin Groothuis freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-10-30 19:12:20 UTC
Maintainer of misc/dnetc,

Please note that PR ports/88250 just has been submitted.

If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix
you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch
and a committer will take care of it.

The full text of the PR can be found at:
    http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/88250

-- 
Edwin Groothuis
edwin@FreeBSD.org
Comment 2 Marcus Alves Grando freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-10-31 00:52:05 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

Ask for maintainer approval.
Comment 3 Tim Bishop freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-11-01 12:26:48 UTC
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:12:20PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> Please note that PR ports/88250 just has been submitted.
> 
> The full text of the PR can be found at:
>     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/88250


What's the reasoning behind removing the INFO file?

Cheers,
Tim.

-- 
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
Comment 4 Andrew Pantyukhin 2005-11-01 15:39:25 UTC
On 11/1/05, Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:12:20PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > Please note that PR ports/88250 just has been submitted.
> >
> > The full text of the PR can be found at:
> >     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/88250
>
> What's the reasoning behind removing the INFO file?
>
> Cheers,
> Tim.
>
> --
> Tim Bishop
> http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
> PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
>
>
>

It's an almost exact copy of pkg-descr. I gather the last
thing we want is an unnecessary file in the ports tree.
Comment 5 Tim Bishop freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-11-01 15:44:16 UTC
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:39:25PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote:
> On 11/1/05, Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:12:20PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > Please note that PR ports/88250 just has been submitted.
> > >
> > > The full text of the PR can be found at:
> > >     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/88250
> >
> > What's the reasoning behind removing the INFO file?
> 
> It's an almost exact copy of pkg-descr. I gather the last
> thing we want is an unnecessary file in the ports tree.

It's installed as info for the user - but pkg-descr could be installed,
or maybe nothing at all. Predates me taking over the port.

I don't have strong feelings either way, so I'm happy for it to go
unless anyone else cares? :-)

Tim.

-- 
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
Comment 6 Andrew Pantyukhin 2005-11-01 15:52:43 UTC
On 11/1/05, Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:39:25PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote:
> > On 11/1/05, Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:12:20PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > > Please note that PR ports/88250 just has been submitted.
> > > >
> > > > The full text of the PR can be found at:
> > > >     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/88250
> > >
> > > What's the reasoning behind removing the INFO file?
> >
> > It's an almost exact copy of pkg-descr. I gather the last
> > thing we want is an unnecessary file in the ports tree.
>
> It's installed as info for the user - but pkg-descr could be installed,
> or maybe nothing at all. Predates me taking over the port.
>
> I don't have strong feelings either way, so I'm happy for it to go
> unless anyone else cares? :-)
>
> Tim.
>
> --
> Tim Bishop
> http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
> PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
>

I'm afraid, that's your decision to make, General :-)
Comment 7 Tim Bishop freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-11-01 15:56:01 UTC
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:52:43PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote:
> On 11/1/05, Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:39:25PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote:
> > > On 11/1/05, Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:12:20PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > > > Please note that PR ports/88250 just has been submitted.
> > > > >
> > > > > The full text of the PR can be found at:
> > > > >     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/88250
> > > >
> > > > What's the reasoning behind removing the INFO file?
> > >
> > > It's an almost exact copy of pkg-descr. I gather the last
> > > thing we want is an unnecessary file in the ports tree.
> >
> > It's installed as info for the user - but pkg-descr could be installed,
> > or maybe nothing at all. Predates me taking over the port.
> >
> > I don't have strong feelings either way, so I'm happy for it to go
> > unless anyone else cares? :-)
> 
> I'm afraid, that's your decision to make, General :-)

I suppose there's no life or death involved ;-)

I approve this PR: commit it as is, but also remove the INFO file from
the repository.

Tim.

-- 
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
Comment 8 Sergey Matveychuk freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-11-01 19:47:35 UTC
State Changed
From-To: feedback->open

Maintainer approval received
Comment 9 Pav Lucistnik freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-11-02 21:45:16 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed, thanks!