There is a new version of textproc/redland available Release note: http://librdf.org/RELEASE.html Fix: My patch follows: How-To-Repeat: N/A
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->itetcu Take for tinderbox testing.
On May 8, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/96978 Please hold off on committing this change, it doesn't seem to build on 4.x or 5.x with this failure: [ ... ] cc -O -pipe -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -march=pentium rpath=/usr/ lib:/usr/local/lib -o .libs/roqet roqet.o -L/usr/local/lib ../ src/.libs/librasqal.so /usr/local/lib/libraptor.so /usr/local/lib/ libxslt.so /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so -lz /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so - lm -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib ../src/.libs/librasqal.so: undefined reference to `raptor_iostream_write_uri' ../src/.libs/librasqal.so: undefined reference to `raptor_qname_get_namespace' ../src/.libs/librasqal.so: undefined reference to `raptor_namespaces_qname_from_uri' gmake[2]: *** [roqet] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/redland/work/ redland-1.0.4/rasqal/utils' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/redland/work/ redland-1.0.4/rasqal' gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 2 I'm looking towards updating textproc/raptor and textproc/redland- bindings also; waiting until those play nice together is probably a good thought. Thanks! -- -Chuck
I've submitted an update to textproc/redland-bindings which hopefully can be committed together with this update. However, please add the following patch to fix the pkg-plist: diff -dur redland.old/pkg-plist redland/pkg-plist --- redland.old/pkg-plist Mon May 8 17:03:23 2006 +++ redland/pkg-plist Mon May 8 17:25:39 2006 @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ share/gtk-doc/html/rasqal/rasqal-section-query.html share/gtk-doc/html/rasqal/rasqal-section-triple.html share/gtk-doc/html/rasqal/rasqal.devhelp +share/gtk-doc/html/rasqal/rasqal.devhelp2 share/gtk-doc/html/rasqal/rasqal-section-triples-source.html share/gtk-doc/html/rasqal/rasqal-section-variable.html share/gtk-doc/html/rasqal/rasqal.html @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ share/gtk-doc/html/redland/redland-uri.html share/gtk-doc/html/redland/redland-world.html share/gtk-doc/html/redland/redland.devhelp +share/gtk-doc/html/redland/redland.devhelp2 share/gtk-doc/html/redland/redland.html share/gtk-doc/html/redland/right.png share/gtk-doc/html/redland/style.css -- -Chuck
Hi-- On May 8, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Next time please do a follow-up to the PR so we have the reason > you, as > maintainer, reject the PR. [ ... ] > Uh, raptor PR was commited by erwin since you approved it, soryr for > the noise. I'll suspend both redland PRs. At least one of us (if not both) may be confused. :-) The build failure I'd gotten was because I didn't update my 4.x box to raptor-1.4.9 first. I think the redland PR 96978 is OK to commit (well, with the pkg-plist update), and I would be happy to approve it now that I've had a chance to look things over. However, PR 96998 depends on 96978, and should be committed together with or after 96978 is committed, once the existing maintainer approves handing redland-bindings over. -- -Chuck PS: I have been CC:ing <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>...?
On Mon, 8 May 2006 18:36:33 -0400 Chuck Swiger <chuck@pkix.net> wrote: > Hi-- > > On May 8, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Next time please do a follow-up to the PR so we have the reason > > you, as > > maintainer, reject the PR. > [ ... ] > > Uh, raptor PR was commited by erwin since you approved it, soryr for > > the noise. I'll suspend both redland PRs. > > At least one of us (if not both) may be confused. :-) That would be me because I understood your "I'm looking towards updating..." as "I'm looking forward to..." :-/ > The build failure I'd gotten was because I didn't update my 4.x box > to raptor-1.4.9 first. I think the redland PR 96978 is OK to commit > (well, with the pkg-plist update), and I would be happy to approve it > now that I've had a chance to look things over. OK. > However, PR 96998 depends on 96978, and should be committed together > with or after 96978 is committed, once the existing maintainer > approves handing redland-bindings over. OK; I will wait then for this approval and them commit both. > PS: I have been CC:ing <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>...? And I haven't :-/ Yeh I'm confused alright by my own mail filters. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #371: Incorrectly configured static routes on the corerouters
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed, with minor changes. Thanks!