Summary: | editor/emacs-devel: PGTK option with X server is unsupported | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Yoshiaki Kasahara <ykasap> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | emacs (Nobody) <emacs> |
Status: | New --- | ||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | emacs, jbeich |
Priority: | --- | Flags: | jbeich:
maintainer-feedback?
(emacs) |
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any |
Description
Yoshiaki Kasahara
2022-12-15 01:25:39 UTC
If stability is a real concern PGTK (and maybe XAW) can probably be moved into a flavor. Unfortunately, without provides/requires in Mk/bsd.port.mk that may require bloating USES=emacs packages with more flavors. -devel suffix in emacs-devel already implies adventurous users: Emacs snapshots can cause crashes or break Elisp code. According to bsdstats "emacs-nox" (63) is more popular than "emacs" (49) and "emacs-devel" (2) is more popular than "emacs-devel-nox" (0). The ratio discrepancy is curious and can imply a subset chose "emacs-devel" because of Wayland support. Disclaimer: I'm not part of emacs@, just a Wayland user using emacs-devel but not represented in bsdstats (to avoid bias for my ports). Thank you for providing the bsdstats data. The user base is small, and they can probably handle the issue by themselves. So, I think adding more flavor is excessive. I'm fine to have PGTK enabled by default, but I prefer a gentle warning about PGTK in pkg-message similar to the native compilation comment. |