Bug 20863 - [NEW PORT] Utility for searching the ports tree
Summary: [NEW PORT] Utility for searching the ports tree
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-ports (Nobody)
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2000-08-26 15:50 UTC by marko
Modified: 2000-08-28 12:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
file.shar (2.39 KB, text/plain)
2000-08-26 15:50 UTC, marko
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description marko freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2000-08-26 15:50:00 UTC
	A utility for searching the ports tree. It allows more
	detailed search criteria than ``make search key=<string>''
	and accepts all perl(1) regular expressions
Comment 1 alex 2000-08-26 18:22:37 UTC
Thus spake marko@FreeBSD.ORG (marko@FreeBSD.ORG):

> 	A utility for searching the ports tree. It allows more
> 	detailed search criteria than ``make search key=<string>''
> 	and accepts all perl(1) regular expressions

Nice!

but:

> #	/usr/ports/sysutils/sp

This name is way too short, it should be called portsearch or similar.

On the other hand, it could also be imported into the ports Tools dir
(my favourite)

Alex

-- 
cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory
Comment 2 marko freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2000-08-26 18:48:06 UTC
On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 07:22:37PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake marko@FreeBSD.ORG (marko@FreeBSD.ORG):
> 
> > 	A utility for searching the ports tree. It allows more
> > 	detailed search criteria than ``make search key=<string>''
> > 	and accepts all perl(1) regular expressions
> 
> Nice!
> 

Thanks

> but:
> 
> > #	/usr/ports/sysutils/sp
> 
> This name is way too short, it should be called portsearch or similar.
> 

I was upholding the fine Unix tradition of brevity and terseness :)

> On the other hand, it could also be imported into the ports Tools dir
> (my favourite)
> 

Who needs to approve that, asami?

> Alex
> 
> -- 
> cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory

-- 
		4.4 - The number of the Beastie
________________________________________________________________
51.44°N  FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org
2.057°W  My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark
mailto:marko@freebsd.org                http://www.radan.com
Comment 3 alex 2000-08-26 18:51:50 UTC
Thus spake Mark Ovens (marko@freebsd.org):

> Who needs to approve that, asami?

Noone, if you put it into the scripts dir.

Update the README file as well.

Alex

-- 
cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory
Comment 4 marko freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2000-08-26 21:40:16 UTC
On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 07:51:50PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Mark Ovens (marko@freebsd.org):
> 
> > Who needs to approve that, asami?
> 
> Noone, if you put it into the scripts dir.
> 

OK, so if I rename it ``portsearch'' and add it to the scripts dir
will you approve it?

> Update the README file as well.
> 

What should I do with the manpage?
``man sp | col -b > README.portsearch''
and put it in the scripts dir as well?


> Alex
> 
> -- 
> cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory

-- 
		4.4 - The number of the Beastie
________________________________________________________________
51.44°N  FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org
2.057°W  My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark
mailto:marko@freebsd.org                http://www.radan.com
Comment 5 marko freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2000-08-28 12:37:36 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed to Tools/scripts instead of as a port at alex's suggestion.