The design of the fuse protocol requires the client to send FUSE_OPEN every time that a file is opened. That's necessary for two reasons: 1) Permission checks are handled by the server 2) The server may need to know what open(2) flags were used with each open and with subsequent operations associated with that file descriptor. It uses the fh parameter to track that. However, FreeBSD's fuse module takes a shortcut: it tries to reuse the same fh for multiple files, as long as their open flags were the same. But this approach has multiple problems: 1) It only checks the first 2 bits of the open flags. To do otherwise would take a prohibitive amount of RAM (bug 236340). 2) It will reuse file handles between multiple different processes as long as their open flags are the same, defeating the ability of the daemon to validate permissions. 3) It isn't even ok to reuse filehandles within the same process for opens that have the exact same flags. The daemon might be doing something weird like treating each file descriptor as a socket or something. It's allowed to do that. This bug may be very hard to solve. The problem is that our vnode ops are all file-agnostic. VOP_WRITE, for example, doesn't know what file descriptor was used to initiate a write. We could solve the problem by implementing a custom fileops structure for fuse. However, that may require re-implementing most of kern/vfs_vnops.c just for fuse. Or, we could add a struct file* argument to most VOPs, but that would probably meet with some justified resistance. Or, we could always operate as if the default_permissions mount option were used and do all privilege checking in the kernel. Then we could get away with only sending FUSE_OPEN the first time that a file is opened. Of course, we would need to actually make default_permissions work first, but that's another bug...
A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Thu Mar 28 03:30:06 UTC 2019 New revision: 345626 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345626 Log: fusefs: add a regression test for bug 236844 fusefs should send a FUSE_OPEN for every open(2) so the daemon can validate accesses. PR: 236844 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Changes: projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/allow_other.cc projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/fsync.cc projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/mockfs.cc projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/open.cc projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/utils.cc projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/utils.hh
A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Sat Mar 30 17:24:12 UTC 2019 New revision: 345736 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345736 Log: fusefs: add another regression test for bug 236844 This test shows how bug 236844 can lead to a privilege escalation when used with the -o allow_other mount option. PR: 236844 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Changes: projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/allow_other.cc
A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Sun Mar 31 03:19:12 UTC 2019 New revision: 345742 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345742 Log: fusefs: replace the fufh table with a linked list The FUSE protocol allows each open file descriptor to have a unique file handle. On FreeBSD, these file handles must all be stored in the vnode. The old method (also used by OSX and OpenBSD) is to store them all in a small array. But that limits the total number that can be stored. This commit replaces the array with a linked list (a technique also used by Illumos). There is not yet any change in functionality, but this is the first step to fixing several bugs. PR: 236329, 236340, 236381, 236560, 236844 Discussed with: cem Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Changes: projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.c projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.h projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_internal.c projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.c projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.h projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_vnops.c
One other option would be to only open each fuse file once, or once for each combination of flags, but always send FUSE_ACCESS on every attempt to open. That would solve this bug's security issues. It wouldn't solve the filesystem-wants-to-treat-each-file-descriptor-like-a-socket problem, but I'm skeptical of how many fuse file systems really require that. Unfortunately, libfuse allows file systems to ignore FUSE_ACCESS. A file system that doesn't implement the access method is treated as enabling all accesses. That's a very unsafe default. In a survey of 32 fuse filesystems from ports, only 14 implement access. Among those that don't are some that really should be doing server-side validation, like fusefs-smbnetfs, fusefs-webdavfs, fusefs-curlftpfs, and fusefs-s3backer.
A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Mon Apr 1 20:42:17 UTC 2019 New revision: 345781 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345781 Log: fusefs: send FUSE_OPEN for every open(2) with unique credentials By default, FUSE performs authorization in the server. That means that it's insecure for the client to reuse FUSE file handles between different users, groups, or processes. Linux handles this problem by creating a different FUSE file handle for every file descriptor. FreeBSD can't, due to differences in our VFS design. This commit adds credential information to each fuse_filehandle. During open(2), fusefs will now only reuse a file handle if it matches the exact same access mode, pid, uid, and gid of the calling process. PR: 236844 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Changes: projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.c projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.h projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_io.c projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_io.h projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.c projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.h projects/fuse2/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_vnops.c projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/allow_other.cc projects/fuse2/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/open.cc
This is complete on the fuse2 branch.
A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Wed Aug 7 00:38:31 UTC 2019 New revision: 350665 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350665 Log: fusefs: merge from projects/fuse2 This commit imports the new fusefs driver. It raises the protocol level from 7.8 to 7.23, fixes many bugs, adds a test suite for the driver, and adds many new features. New features include: * Optional kernel-side permissions checks (-o default_permissions) * Implement VOP_MKNOD, VOP_BMAP, and VOP_ADVLOCK * Allow interrupting FUSE operations * Support named pipes and unix-domain sockets in fusefs file systems * Forward UTIME_NOW during utimensat(2) to the daemon * kqueue support for /dev/fuse * Allow updating mounts with "mount -u" * Allow exporting fusefs file systems over NFS * Server-initiated invalidation of the name cache or data cache * Respect RLIMIT_FSIZE * Try to support servers as old as protocol 7.4 Performance enhancements include: * Implement FUSE's FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE and FUSE_ASYNC_READ flags * Cache file attributes * Cache lookup entries, both positive and negative * Server-selectable cache modes: writethrough, writeback, or uncached * Write clustering * Readahead * Use counter(9) for statistical reporting PR: 199934 216391 233783 234581 235773 235774 235775 PR: 236226 236231 236236 236291 236329 236381 236405 PR: 236327 236466 236472 236473 236474 236530 236557 PR: 236560 236844 237052 237181 237588 238565 Reviewed by: bcr (man pages) Reviewed by: cem, ngie, rpokala, glebius, kib, bde, emaste (post-commit review on project branch) MFC after: 3 weeks Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Pull Request: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21110 Changes: _U head/ head/MAINTAINERS head/UPDATING head/etc/mtree/BSD.tests.dist head/sbin/mount_fusefs/mount_fusefs.8 head/sbin/mount_fusefs/mount_fusefs.c head/share/man/man5/fusefs.5 head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_device.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_internal.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_internal.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_io.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_io.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_ipc.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_ipc.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_kernel.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_main.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_param.h head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_vfsops.c head/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_vnops.c head/sys/sys/param.h head/tests/sys/fs/Makefile head/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/
A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Sun Sep 15 04:14:36 UTC 2019 New revision: 352351 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352351 Log: MFC the new fusefs driver MFC r350665, r350990, r350992, r351039, r351042, r351061, r351066, r351113, r351560, r351961, r351963, r352021, r352025, r352230 r350665: fusefs: merge from projects/fuse2 This commit imports the new fusefs driver. It raises the protocol level from 7.8 to 7.23, fixes many bugs, adds a test suite for the driver, and adds many new features. New features include: * Optional kernel-side permissions checks (-o default_permissions) * Implement VOP_MKNOD, VOP_BMAP, and VOP_ADVLOCK * Allow interrupting FUSE operations * Support named pipes and unix-domain sockets in fusefs file systems * Forward UTIME_NOW during utimensat(2) to the daemon * kqueue support for /dev/fuse * Allow updating mounts with "mount -u" * Allow exporting fusefs file systems over NFS * Server-initiated invalidation of the name cache or data cache * Respect RLIMIT_FSIZE * Try to support servers as old as protocol 7.4 Performance enhancements include: * Implement FUSE's FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE and FUSE_ASYNC_READ flags * Cache file attributes * Cache lookup entries, both positive and negative * Server-selectable cache modes: writethrough, writeback, or uncached * Write clustering * Readahead * Use counter(9) for statistical reporting PR: 199934 216391 233783 234581 235773 235774 235775 PR: 236226 236231 236236 236291 236329 236381 236405 PR: 236327 236466 236472 236473 236474 236530 236557 PR: 236560 236844 237052 237181 237588 238565 Reviewed by: bcr (man pages) Reviewed by: cem, ngie, rpokala, glebius, kib, bde, emaste (post-commit review on project branch) Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Pull Request: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21110 r350990: fusefs: add SVN Keywords to the test files Reported by: SVN pre-commit hooks MFC-With: r350665 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation r350992: fusefs: skip some tests when unsafe aio is disabled MFC-With: r350665 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation r351039: fusefs: fix intermittency in the default_permissions.Unlink.ok test The test needs to expect a FUSE_FORGET operation. Most of the time the test would pass anyway, because by chance FUSE_FORGET would arrive after the unmount. MFC-With: 350665 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation r351042: fusefs: Fix the size of fuse_getattr_in In FUSE protocol 7.9, the size of the FUSE_GETATTR request has increased. However, the fusefs driver is currently not sending the additional fields. In our implementation, the additional fields are always zero, so I there haven't been any test failures until now. But fusefs-lkl requires the request's length to be correct. Fix this bug, and also enhance the test suite to catch similar bugs. PR: 239830 MFC-With: 350665 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation r351061: fusefs: fix the 32-bit build after 351042 Reported by: jhb MFC-With: 351042 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation r351066: fusefs: fix conditional from r351061 The entirety of r351061 was a copy/paste error. I'm sorry I've been comitting so hastily. Reported by: rpokala Reviewed by: rpokala MFC-With: 351061 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21265 r351113: fusefs: don't send the namespace during listextattr The FUSE_LISTXATTR operation always returns the full list of a file's extended attributes, in all namespaces. There's no way to filter the list server-side. However, currently FreeBSD's fusefs driver sends a namespace string with the FUSE_LISTXATTR request. That behavior was probably copied from fuse_vnop_getextattr, which has an attribute name argument. It's been there ever since extended attribute support was added in r324620. This commit removes it. Reviewed by: cem Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21280 r351560: fusefs: Fix some bugs regarding the size of the LISTXATTR list * A small error in r338152 let to the returned size always being exactly eight bytes too large. * The FUSE_LISTXATTR operation works like Linux's listxattr(2): if the caller does not provide enough space, then the server should return ERANGE rather than return a truncated list. That's true even though in FUSE's case the kernel doesn't provide space to the client at all; it simply requests a maximum size for the list. We previously weren't handling the case where the server returns ERANGE even though the kernel requested as much size as the server had told us it needs; that can happen due to a race. * We also need to ensure that a pathological server that always returns ERANGE no matter what size we request in FUSE_LISTXATTR won't cause an infinite loop in the kernel. As of this commit, it will instead cause an infinite loop that exits and enters the kernel on each iteration, allowing signals to be processed. Reviewed by: cem Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21287 r351961: Coverity fixes in fusefs(5) CID 1404532 fixes a signed vs unsigned comparison error in fuse_vnop_bmap. It could potentially have resulted in VOP_BMAP reporting too many consecutive blocks. CID 1404364 is much worse. It was an array access by an untrusted, user-provided variable. It could potentially have resulted in a malicious file system crashing the kernel or worse. Reported by: Coverity Reviewed by: emaste Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21466 r351963: fusefs: coverity cleanup in the tests Address the following defects reported by Coverity: * Structurally dead code (CID 1404366): set m_quit before FAIL, not after * Unchecked return value of sysctlbyname (CID 1404321) * Unchecked return value of stat(2) (CID 1404471) * Unchecked return value of open(2) (CID 1404402, 1404529) * Unchecked return value of dup(2) (CID 1404478) * Buffer overflows. These are all false positives caused by the fact that Coverity thinks I'm using a buffer to store strings, when in fact I'm really just using it to store a byte array that happens to be initialized with a string. I'm changing the type from char to uint8_t in the hopes that it will placate Coverity. (CID 1404338, 1404350, 1404367, 1404376, 1404379, 1404381, 1404388, 1404403, 1404425, 1404433, 1404434, 1404474, 1404480, 1404484, 1404503, 1404505) * False positive file descriptor leak. I'm going to try to fix this with Coverity modeling, but I'll also change an EXPECT to ASSERT so we don't perform meaningless assertions after the failure. (CID 1404320, 1404324, 1404440, 1404445). * Unannotated file descriptor leak. This will be followed up by a Coverity modeling change. (CID 1404326, 1404334, 1404336, 1404357, 1404361, 1404372, 1404391, 1404395, 1404409, 1404430, 1404448, 1404451, 1404455, 1404457, 1404458, 1404460) * Uninitialized variables in C++ constructors (CID 1404327, 1404346). In the case of m_maxphys, this actually led to part of the FUSE_INIT's response being set to stack garbage during the WriteCluster::clustering test. * Uninitialized sun_len field in struct sockaddr_un (CID 1404330, 1404371, 1404429). Reported by: Coverity Reviewed by: emaste Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21457 r352021: fusefs: suppress some Coverity resource leak CIDs in the tests The fusefs tests deliberately leak file descriptors. To do otherwise would add extra complications to the tests' mock FUSE server. This annotation should hopefully convince Coverity to shut up about the leaks. Reviewed by: uqs Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation r352025: mount_fusefs: fix a segfault on memory allocation failure Reported by: Coverity Coverity CID: 1354188 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation r352230: fusefs: Fix iosize for FUSE_WRITE in 7.8 compat mode When communicating with a FUSE server that implements version 7.8 (or older) of the FUSE protocol, the FUSE_WRITE request structure is 16 bytes shorter than normal. The protocol version check wasn't applied universally, leading to an extra 16 bytes being sent to such servers. The extra bytes were allocated and bzero()d, so there was no information disclosure. Reviewed by: emaste MFC-With: r350665 Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21557 Changes: _U stable/12/ stable/12/MAINTAINERS stable/12/UPDATING stable/12/etc/mtree/BSD.tests.dist stable/12/sbin/mount_fusefs/mount_fusefs.8 stable/12/sbin/mount_fusefs/mount_fusefs.c stable/12/share/man/man5/fusefs.5 stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_device.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_file.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_internal.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_internal.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_io.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_io.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_ipc.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_ipc.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_kernel.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_main.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_node.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_param.h stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_vfsops.c stable/12/sys/fs/fuse/fuse_vnops.c stable/12/sys/sys/param.h stable/12/tests/sys/fs/Makefile stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/ stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/access.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/allow_other.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/bmap.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/create.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/default_permissions.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/default_permissions_privileged.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/destroy.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/dev_fuse_poll.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/fifo.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/flush.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/forget.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/fsync.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/fsyncdir.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/getattr.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/interrupt.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/io.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/link.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/locks.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/lookup.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/mkdir.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/mknod.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/mockfs.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/mockfs.hh stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/mount.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/nfs.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/notify.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/open.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/opendir.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/read.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/readdir.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/readlink.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/release.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/releasedir.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/rename.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/rmdir.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/setattr.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/statfs.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/symlink.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/unlink.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/utils.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/utils.hh stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/write.cc stable/12/tests/sys/fs/fusefs/xattr.cc