Bug 24114 - New port: libtar: A library for manipulating POSIX and GNU tar files
Summary: New port: libtar: A library for manipulating POSIX and GNU tar files
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-ports (Nobody)
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-01-06 19:10 UTC by George Reid
Modified: 2001-03-10 19:40 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
file.shar (8.14 KB, text/plain)
2001-01-06 19:10 UTC, George Reid
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description George Reid 2001-01-06 19:10:01 UTC
libtar is a C library for manipulating tar archives. It supports both
the strict POSIX tar format and many of the commonly-used GNU
extensions.

- George Reid
greid@ukug.uk.freebsd.org

How-To-Repeat: n/a
Comment 1 Akinori MUSHA 2001-01-06 19:47:08 UTC
At Sat, 6 Jan 2001 19:06:50 +0000 (GMT),
George Reid wrote:
> libtar is a C library for manipulating tar archives. It supports both

Seems to me that it should go under the `archiver' category, then.

-- 
                     /
                    /__  __            Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
                   / )  )  ) )  /     FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp

"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"
Comment 2 George Reid 2001-01-06 22:17:37 UTC
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

>  Seems to me that it should go under the `archiver' category, then.

And not under 'devel' like zziplib? Perhaps this needs to be moved.

G

"And then it comes to be that the soothing light
   at the end of your tunnel was just a freight
            train, comin' your way."

      George Reid * greid@ukug.uk.freebsd.org
Comment 3 Akinori MUSHA 2001-01-06 23:05:15 UTC
At Sat, 6 Jan 2001 22:17:37 +0000 (GMT),
George Reid wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> 
> >  Seems to me that it should go under the `archiver' category, then.
> 
> And not under 'devel' like zziplib? Perhaps this needs to be moved.

Yes, and probably sysutils/{afio,guitar,gtar,star} too.  They look
more suitable in 'archiver' than in 'sysutils', judging from the
meanings of their names and what they actually do.

My 2 yen,

-- 
                     /
                    /__  __            Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
                   / )  )  ) )  /     FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp

"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"
Comment 4 George Reid 2001-01-06 23:30:49 UTC
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

>  Yes, and probably sysutils/{afio,guitar,gtar,star} too.  They look
>  more suitable in 'archiver' than in 'sysutils', judging from the
>  meanings of their names and what they actually do.

Indeed. I wasn't really sure where to put it, so I guess it is the
committer's call.

G

"And then it comes to be that the soothing light
   at the end of your tunnel was just a freight
            train, comin' your way."

      George Reid * greid@ukug.uk.freebsd.org
Comment 5 Christian Weisgerber 2001-01-07 01:08:37 UTC
"Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org>:

>  > >  Seems to me that it should go under the `archiver' category, then.
>  > 
>  > And not under 'devel' like zziplib? Perhaps this needs to be moved.
>  
>  Yes, and probably sysutils/{afio,guitar,gtar,star} too.

I certainly agree that gtar and star should be in archivers.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de
Comment 6 Will Andrews freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2001-03-10 19:40:06 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed, thanks.  Next time remember to remove manpages from the packaging 
list.  I made a files/manpages file since there were so many, and fixed the 
names of all your patchfiles.