Created attachment 225249 [details] Patch Add lang/python310 at version 3.10.0b1 Changes to python39 are minimal (plus some removed patches which were already upstreamed): --- python39/Makefile 2021-05-25 16:55:44.272237000 +0300 +++ python310/Makefile 2021-05-25 16:58:41.519315000 +0300 @@ -3,13 +3,13 @@ PORTNAME= python DISTVERSION= ${PYTHON_DISTVERSION} CATEGORIES= lang python -MASTER_SITES= PYTHON/ftp/python/${DISTVERSION} +MASTER_SITES= PYTHON/ftp/python/3.10.0 PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PYTHON_SUFFIX} DISTNAME= Python-${DISTVERSION} DIST_SUBDIR= python MAINTAINER= python@FreeBSD.org -COMMENT= Interpreted object-oriented programming language +COMMENT= Interpreted object-oriented programming language (beta version) LICENSE= PSFL @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ PLIST_SUB= ABI=${ABIFLAGS} \ XY=${PYTHON_SUFFIX} \ XYDOT=${PYTHON_VER} \ - XYZDOT=${DISTVERSION} \ + XYZDOT=${DISTVERSION:C/[a-z].*//} \ OSMAJOR=${OSVERSION:C/([0-9]*)[0-9]{5}/\1/} # For plat-freebsd* in pkg-plist. https://bugs.python.org/issue19554 OPTIONS_DEFINE= DEBUG IPV6 LIBFFI LIBMPDEC NLS PYMALLOC @@ -116,6 +116,12 @@ DISABLED_EXTENSIONS+= nis .else PLIST_SUB+= NO_NIS="" +.endif + +.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 1200000 +PLIST_SUB+= NEWOPENSSL="@comment " +.else +PLIST_SUB+= NEWOPENSSL="" .endif post-patch: diff -ruN python39/Makefile.version python310/Makefile.version --- python39/Makefile.version 2021-05-25 16:55:44.272304000 +0300 +++ python310/Makefile.version 2021-05-25 16:58:40.856247000 +0300 @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ # Do not forget to update python documentation (lang/python-doc-*) # Run "make -C lang/python-doc-html makesum" -PYTHON_DISTVERSION= 3.9.5 +PYTHON_DISTVERSION= 3.10.0b1
Created attachment 225282 [details] Patch
Created attachment 225285 [details] Patch
A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=930c93129234e5ed3f67be1b8795a5a20e2745db commit 930c93129234e5ed3f67be1b8795a5a20e2745db Author: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2021-04-08 22:31:49 +0000 Commit: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2021-07-14 20:14:55 +0000 lang/python310: add python 3.10.0.beta4 PR: 256150 Approved by: maintainer timeout (python@, 1 month) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30475 Mk/Uses/python.mk | 2 +- Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk | 4 +- lang/Makefile | 1 + lang/python310/Makefile (new) | 159 + lang/python310/Makefile.version (new) | 5 + lang/python310/distinfo (new) | 3 + ...tch-Lib_distutils_command_install__lib.py (new) | 41 + ...Lib_distutils_tests_test__install__lib.py (new) | 33 + lang/python310/files/patch-Makefile.pre.in (new) | 65 + .../files/patch-Misc__python-config.sh.in (new) | 11 + lang/python310/files/pkg-message.in (new) | 12 + lang/python310/pkg-descr (new) | 4 + lang/python310/pkg-plist (new) | 7480 ++++++++++++++++++++ 13 files changed, 7817 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
^Triage: Assign the committer that resolved py-numpy fails (pkg-fallout) for python310, several of: numpy/core/src/multiarray/scalartypes.c.src:3244:81: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1 return _Py_HashDouble(npy_half_to_double(((PyHalfScalarObject *)obj)->obval));
This PR relates to python 3.10 import. Issues with ports failing with 3.10 may be addressed in separate PRs.
(In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #5) Dmitry this is a new failure *due* to the import of the port. Just set numpy to USES=python:-3.9 or add BROKEN for it.
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #6) What about upgrading py-numpy? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251626
(In reply to Thierry Thomas from comment #7) The key is that people take responsibility for their changes. Everyone's all happy being motivated to push their changes through (even in the absence of review), but not the follow-up. That's not how things work. In the absence of of a numpy update (which I don't believe Dimitry should need to take responsibility for), BROKEN or -3.9.
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #6) > Dmitry this is a new failure *due* to the import of the port. Just set numpy to USES=python:-3.9 or add BROKEN for it. Would you please explain where and how you've experienced this failure, as AFAIK we don't build packages for non-default python flavors. Regardless, keeping supported python version range up to date is port maintainer's responsibility (I'd be happy to join python@ which I already volunteered for on irc and/or maillist without any response, and help take care of it). A lot of packages are expected to fail with new (and especially beta) python version, and it should not be a show stopper for python import as long as it's not used by default.