xt, xalan-j, saxon should have the same CATEGORIES because these are all XSLT implementations written in Java. Fix: Before fix, what's the right categories? (IMHO, "textproc java", even though I send-pr'ed the saxon port for "java textproc" :) How-To-Repeat: % cd /usr/ports % grep CATEGORIES textproc/xt/Makefile java/xalan-j/Makefile textproc/saxon/Makefile textproc/xt/Makefile:CATEGORIES= textproc java/xalan-j/Makefile:CATEGORIES= java textproc textproc/saxon/Makefile:CATEGORIES= textproc java
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 18:52:35 +0900, Kimura Fuyuki wrote: > % cd /usr/ports > % grep CATEGORIES textproc/xt/Makefile java/xalan-j/Makefile textproc/saxon/Makefile > textproc/xt/Makefile:CATEGORIES= textproc > java/xalan-j/Makefile:CATEGORIES= java textproc > textproc/saxon/Makefile:CATEGORIES= textproc java > >Fix: > Before fix, what's the right categories? > (IMHO, "textproc java", even though I send-pr'ed the saxon port for > "java textproc" :) I think that "textproc java" is better :) -- int i;main(){for(;i["]<i;++i){--i;}"];read('-'-'-',i+++"hell\ o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);} -- IOCCC 1984
> I think that "textproc java" is better :) I agree. Other maintainers? (FYI: NetBSD folks chose "textproc www" ...hmm) http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/textproc/saxon/
I added "java" category into textproc/xt. Should we change primary category of xalan-j to textproc (by repocopy)? If not, I'll close this PR. -- Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc. <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
(Cc'ed to the maintainer of the xalan-j port) At Wed, 06 Feb 2002 16:46:58 +0900, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> wrote: > > I added "java" category into textproc/xt. > > Should we change primary category of xalan-j to textproc (by > repocopy)? I think, yes, but please ask the maintainer.
Yup. Xalan-j should belong in textproc. Who will ask for the repocopy? Should I? Ernst (znerd@FreeBSD.org)
At Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:52:35 +0100, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Yup. Xalan-j should belong in textproc. Who will ask for the repocopy? Should > I? Yes, please ask about this to portmgr. -- Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc. <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
Done. I've sent a CC to: * Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> * Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@mj.0038.net> Ernst
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports->portmgr repo-copy request : move java/xalan-j to textproc/
Responsible Changed From-To: portmgr->cvs Repo copy request
Responsible Changed From-To: cvs->portmgr The proper way to make a repocopy request is for the ports committer who's going to do the work to mail portmgr@ and cvs@ with the request. Cvs@ isn't responsible for PRs.
State Changed From-To: open->suspended Suspended awaiting committer to clean up after the repo-copy
State Changed From-To: suspended->open repo copy requests need to be owned by a committer
Responsible Changed From-To: portmgr->ports-bugs repo copy requests need to be owned by a committer
Responsible Changed From-To: ports-bugs->freebsd-ports-bugs Fix responsible person.
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->znerd The best that I can tell, this stale PR is about java/xalan-j. Assign to that port's maintainer in the off-chance that this will get this PR unstuck.
Responsible Changed From-To: znerd->linimon znerd has passed this one over to me.
State Changed From-To: open->closed repocopy done, thanks.