This updates the devel/subversion port to 0.16.0, which fixes several bugs. The www/neon and devel/apr ports need to be updated too. The REGEX patches allow apr 0.9.1 to be used. This is s temporary measure until the Apache Portable Runtime (apr) project releases apr 0.9.2 and higher.
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 06:41 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > >> Description: > This updates the devel/subversion port to 0.16.0, which fixes > several bugs. > The www/neon and devel/apr ports need to be updated too. > The REGEX patches allow apr 0.9.1 to be used. This is s temporary > measure > until the Apache Portable Runtime (apr) project releases apr 0.9.2 > and > higher. > off the top of my head this looks fine (as do the neon and apr updates). would you be interested in taking over maintainership of these three ports? i haven't had the time or motivation to work on them in a while, and it would be nice to have someone keeping an eye on them. -garrett
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:27:24AM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote: > off the top of my head this looks fine (as do the neon and apr > updates). would you be interested in taking over maintainership of > these three ports? i haven't had the time or motivation to work on > them in a while, and it would be nice to have someone keeping an eye on > them. OK, I can do it. How does this work? I don't have a commit bit. -- Craig Rodrigues http://www.gis.net/~craigr rodrigc@attbi.com
Adding to audit trail, obtained from misfiled PR 46398: On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:20:42AM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote: > On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 06:41 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > >> Description: > > This updates the devel/subversion port to 0.16.0, which fixes > > several bugs. > > The www/neon and devel/apr ports need to be updated too. > > The REGEX patches allow apr 0.9.1 to be used. This is s temporary > > measure > > until the Apache Portable Runtime (apr) project releases apr 0.9.2 > > and > > higher. > > > > off the top of my head this looks fine (as do the neon and apr > updates). would you be interested in taking over maintainership of > these three ports? i haven't had the time or motivation to work on > them in a while, and it would be nice to have someone keeping an eye on > them. > > -garrett
State Changed From-To: open->closed committed, thanks