Well...the author upgraded nmh from 0.26 to 0.27 the beginning of July, so I updated my port files a little later. The same day, he announced a pre-release beta of 0.28. So, I figured I'd old off until 0.28 released to update the port. Well...that was about a month ago now...I figure that if I submit the port upgrade, the karmic pressure will cause 0.28 to be released tomorrow...:-) Fix: Apply the attached patch to the mail/nmh port.
if sendfiles(1) is a new man page that comes with the update then this change should be reflected in the Makefile, and the PLIST should have the gzip'd version. On Fri, 14 Aug 1998, Scott Blachowicz wrote: > >Number: 7617 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: update mail/nmh port to nmh-0.27 > --- ../nmh-curr/pkg/PLIST Mon Feb 23 11:21:00 1998 > +++ ./pkg/PLIST Sun Jul 12 15:02:23 1998 > @@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ > man/man1/rmm.1.gz > man/man1/scan.1.gz > man/man1/send.1.gz > +man/man1/sendfiles.1 > man/man1/show.1.gz > man/man1/slocal.1.gz > man/man1/sortm.1.gz - bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560 - "Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany
Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> wrote: > > if sendfiles(1) is a new man page that comes with the update then this > change should be reflected in the Makefile, and the PLIST should have the > gzip'd version. Oops...appended is a corrected patch. Seems I messed it up the last time a man page got added - you'd think I would've learned by now :-). > On Fri, 14 Aug 1998, Scott Blachowicz wrote: > > > >Number: 7617 > > >Category: ports > > >Synopsis: update mail/nmh port to nmh-0.27 > > > --- ../nmh-curr/pkg/PLIST Mon Feb 23 11:21:00 1998 > > +++ ./pkg/PLIST Sun Jul 12 15:02:23 1998 > > > @@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ > > man/man1/rmm.1.gz > > man/man1/scan.1.gz > > man/man1/send.1.gz > > +man/man1/sendfiles.1 > > man/man1/show.1.gz > > man/man1/slocal.1.gz > > man/man1/sortm.1.gz Sorry about that... -- Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org ========== Corrected patch follows: diff -ur ../nmh-curr/Makefile ./Makefile --- ../nmh-curr/Makefile Sat Jun 6 02:01:59 1998 +++ ./Makefile Sat Aug 15 11:28:43 1998 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ # New ports collection makefile for: nmh -# Version required: 0.26 +# Version required: 0.27 # Date created: 26 July 1997 # Whom: Scott Blachowicz <Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org> # # $Id: Makefile,v 1.9 1998/06/05 15:10:54 itojun Exp $ # -DISTNAME= nmh-0.26 +DISTNAME= nmh-0.27 CATEGORIES= mail MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.math.gatech.edu/pub/nmh/ @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ mark.1 mh-chart.1 mhl.1 mhmail.1 mhn.1 mhparam.1 mhpath.1 msgchk.1 msh.1 \ next.1 nmh.1 packf.1 pick.1 prev.1 prompter.1 rcvdist.1 rcvpack.1 \ rcvstore.1 rcvtty.1 refile.1 repl.1 rmf.1 rmm.1 scan.1 send.1 show.1 \ - slocal.1 sortm.1 vmh.1 whatnow.1 whom.1 mhbuild.1 + slocal.1 sortm.1 vmh.1 whatnow.1 whom.1 mhbuild.1 sendfiles.1 MAN5= mh-alias.5 mh-draft.5 mh-format.5 mh-mail.5 mh-profile.5 \ mh-sequence.5 mh-tailor.5 diff -ur ../nmh-curr/files/md5 ./files/md5 --- ../nmh-curr/files/md5 Sat Jun 6 02:01:59 1998 +++ ./files/md5 Sun Jul 12 14:30:06 1998 @@ -1 +1 @@ -MD5 (nmh-0.26.tar.gz) = d1f06379f73e2021017d0377948fed3f +MD5 (nmh-0.27.tar.gz) = 62395d23c686b230ed0f2f17fbc2e01a diff -ur ../nmh-curr/pkg/PLIST ./pkg/PLIST --- ../nmh-curr/pkg/PLIST Mon Feb 23 11:21:00 1998 +++ ./pkg/PLIST Sat Aug 15 11:28:56 1998 @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ bin/send bin/show bin/sortm +bin/viamail bin/whatnow bin/whom etc/nmh/MailAliases @@ -67,9 +68,9 @@ libexec/nmh/rcvpack libexec/nmh/rcvstore libexec/nmh/rcvtty +libexec/nmh/sendfiles libexec/nmh/slocal libexec/nmh/spost -libexec/nmh/viamail man/man1/ali.1.gz man/man1/anno.1.gz man/man1/burst.1.gz @@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ man/man1/rmm.1.gz man/man1/scan.1.gz man/man1/send.1.gz +man/man1/sendfiles.1.gz man/man1/show.1.gz man/man1/slocal.1.gz man/man1/sortm.1.gz
We need to make sure that the files on the web page (http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/porting.html) is always updated with these changes. Also a new page should probaly be made stating recent CHANGES to bsd.port.mk. from the above url: *> Here is a small example: *> *> bin/oneko *> man/man1/oneko.1.gz *> lib/X11/app-defaults/Oneko *> lib/X11/oneko/cat1.xpm *> lib/X11/oneko/cat2.xpm *> lib/X11/oneko/mouse.xpm maybe just a file available on the web page with all the notes on the cvsup updates (which should be descriptive enough, I assume). Thoughts? On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > Again, presuming the MAN? variables are correctly used for all of > those manpages, none of them should be listed in the PLIST. > > [You need, of course, the latest bsd.port.mk] - bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560 - "Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany
On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 11:04:00AM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > if sendfiles(1) is a new man page that comes with the update then this > change should be reflected in the Makefile, and the PLIST should have the > gzip'd version. No, it shouldn't be listed at all in the PLIST, presuming you are correctly using the MAN? variables. > > +++ ./pkg/PLIST Sun Jul 12 15:02:23 1998 > > > @@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ > > man/man1/rmm.1.gz > > man/man1/scan.1.gz > > man/man1/send.1.gz > > +man/man1/sendfiles.1 > > man/man1/show.1.gz > > man/man1/slocal.1.gz > > man/man1/sortm.1.gz Again, presuming the MAN? variables are correctly used for all of those manpages, none of them should be listed in the PLIST. [You need, of course, the latest bsd.port.mk] -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Update committed, thanks!