- Update to bsd.java.mk 2.0 - Use DISTVERSION to avoid using a different port version number than the distfile - Set JAVA_VERSION (for javavmwrapper) in the launcher script - Use an absolute path to launch javavmwrapper - JAVAJARDIR -> JAVALIBDIR (for JAR dependencies) - Use %%JAVAJARDIR%% in pkg-plist Port maintainer (mi@aldan.algebra.com) is cc'd. Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.77
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->hq Submitter is a commiter
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback
Thanks for the work, Herve, but should not we wait for a new release from the vendor with this? Clearly, a *new* port should follow the practice and standards of the new bsd.java.mk, but are the changes really important to "disturb" an existing port without upgrading? Yours, -mi
Responsible Changed From-To: hq->mi This is really mi's port.
[ Sorry, this mail got lost days ago due to some trouble with my SMTP server so I am resending it ] Hi Mikhail, On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:30:23AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Thanks for the work, Herve, but should not we wait for a new release from the > vendor with this? > > Clearly, a *new* port should follow the practice and standards of the new > bsd.java.mk, but are the changes really important to "disturb" an existing > port without upgrading? You're right, we could wait for a new realease but there has been none since february 2004 and I am in the process of updating all ports to bsd.java.mk 2.0 syntax so that we can remove the compatibility layer in bsd.java.mk and move on to implementing new features [1] (there are currently 12 ports left to upgrade [2]). Maybe we could commit the patch without the DISTVERSION thing and no PORTREVISION bump so that the port does not need to be rebuilt by end users... OTOH, the patch to set JAVA_VERSION in the launcher script is an actual improvement to the port. And the JAVAJARDIR/JAVALIBDIR substitution is a fix (same as PREFIX/LOCALBASE differenciation). Herve [1] Java ports monitoring http://pages-perso.esil.univ-mrs.fr/~hquiroz/freebsd/java-ports-monitoring.html [2] Java ports using bsd.java.mk 1.0 syntax and their respective maintainers http://pages-perso.esil.univ-mrs.fr/~hquiroz/freebsd/oldbsdjavamk-maintainers
ÓÅÒÅÄÁ 31 ÔÒÁ×ÅÎØ 2006 08:09, Herve Quiroz ÎÁÐÉÓÁ×: > Maybe we could commit the patch without the DISTVERSION thing and no > PORTREVISION bump so that the port does not need to be rebuilt by end > users... > > OTOH, the patch to set JAVA_VERSION in the launcher script is an actual > improvement to the port. And the JAVAJARDIR/JAVALIBDIR substitution is a > fix (same as PREFIX/LOCALBASE differenciation). Ok, go ahead then... Thanks! -mi
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Patch commited with no PORTVERSION or PORTREVISION bump.